上海后花园交友论坛 – 上海后花园论坛-上海419论坛-夜上海论坛-阿拉爱上海

Gree Group ushered in a new chairman’s shareholding in Gree Electric, which has dropped to less than 4%.

　　Reporter Mao Ning

　　On February 19th, official website of Gree Group showed that Kang Hong had become the party secretary and chairman of the group. It is reported that the former chairman of Gree Group is Zhou Lewei, who succeeded Dong Mingzhu in 2016. Previously, Gree Group was the controlling shareholder of (), but at present, Gree Group holds 3.44% of the shares of Gree Electric (000651.SZ) and is its fourth largest shareholder; When Gree Electric was first listed, Gree Group’s shareholding ratio was as high as 60%.

　　Kang Hong became the chairman of Gree Group.

　　According to official website of Gree Group, Kang Hong has been appointed Party Secretary and Chairman of Gree Group. According to public information, Kang Hong was born in 1976. Before that, Kang Hong was the deputy secretary-general of Zhuhai Municipal Government, and was appointed as the deputy general manager of China Xiong ‘an Group Urban Development Investment Co., Ltd. as a temporary cadre selected by the Central Organization Department.

　　According to People’s Daily Online, during his more than one year in Xiong ‘an, Kang Hong not only participated in the construction of Xiong ‘an International Hotel project, but also participated in the construction management of Group G in Rongdong District of xiong’an new area, the delivery and property management of the first batch of resettlement houses in Rongdong District, and the business and industrial investment promotion of Rongdong District, Rongxi District, Xiongdong District, Xiong ‘an Business Service Center and Huawangcheng.

　　Official website shows that Gree Group, founded in March 1985, is the first state-owned capital investment operation platform in Zhuhai, with the main credit rating of AAA, and its business covers industrial investment, construction investment, urban renewal, construction and installation, service operation and other fields. By the end of 2023, the total assets of Gree Group exceeded 113.2 billion yuan, and the total owner’s equity exceeded 48.3 billion yuan, and the overall operating situation achieved steady and good development.

　　According to official website, Gree Group has built 75 industrial fund clusters with a total subscription scale of over 106.5 billion yuan, and has invested and introduced 194 industrial projects and local projects in Zhuhai with a total investment of 19.83 billion yuan. At the same time, Gree Group has built 16 "standardized+customized" 5.0 industrial new space projects with a total investment of about 19.3 billion yuan and a total construction area of about 3.97 million square meters in all districts of the city, which quickly landed and simultaneously carried out investment promotion operations.

　　The reporter of "Investment Express" noticed that on the eve of the Spring Festival, Gree Group carried out pre-holiday safety production inspection and trade union condolence activities, and Kang Hong, as the "top leader" of the group, officially began to perform his duties. The former chairman of Gree Group was Zhou Lewei, who succeeded Dong Mingzhu in 2016. After stepping down as the former chairman of Gree Group, Dong Mingzhu continued to serve as the chairman, president and legal representative of Gree Electric.

　　The group’s shareholding in Gree Electric has dropped to 3.44%.

　　Previously, Gree Group was the controlling shareholder of Gree Electric. Data show that when Gree Electric first went public in 1996, Gree Group held 60% of the shares. Since then, Gree Group has continuously reduced its shareholding in Gree Electric. In 1998, the shareholding ratio of Gree Group decreased to 55.35%, further decreased to 50.28% in 2000, to 40.84% in 2006, to 22.58% in 2007 and to 18.22% in 2019.

　　At the end of 2019, Gree Group and Zhuhai Mingjun signed the Share Transfer Agreement, and Zhuhai Mingjun, a subsidiary of Gaoyan Capital, acquired 15% equity of Gree Electric from Gree Group for 41.662 billion yuan, becoming the new major shareholder of Gree Electric. After the completion of the equity transfer, Gree Electric changed from a state-owned listed company in Zhuhai to an enterprise without controlling shareholders and actual controllers, and the shareholding ratio of Gree Group decreased from 18.22% to 3.22%.

　　By the end of the third quarter of 2023, Gree Group held 3.44% of Gree Electric’s equity, making it its fourth largest shareholder. As of noon on February 19, the total market value of Gree Electric was about 206.7 billion yuan. According to this calculation, the market value of Gree Electric shares held by Gree Group exceeds 7 billion yuan.

On the Canadian debate program, experts from China and Singapore refuted the ＂China threat theory＂ with facts and won!

　　Caption: At the debate scene, two people on the left are the positive Bai Bangrui and McMaster, and on the right are the opposing Ma Kaishuo and Wang Huiyao; In the voting before and after the debate, the opposing side finally won by 2%.

　　[Special correspondent of Global Times in Canada Lu Ou, special correspondent of Global Times Cao Ming] On the evening of May 9, local time in Toronto, Canada’s famous political debate platform — — "Munk Debates" was held with the theme "Is China a threat to the liberal international order?" The debate on the theme has aroused widespread concern in Canada and the United States. On the one hand, McMaster, former assistant to the President of the United States for national security affairs, and Bai Bangrui, author of "Centennial Marathon" and director of China strategic research at the Hudson Institute in the United States, think that China is a "threat"; on the other hand, Ma Kaishuo, a professor at the National University of Singapore and former rotating chairman of the United Nations Security Council, and Wang Huiyao, founder and director of the China Globalization Think Tank (CCG), refute the former view. There were about 3000 spectators at the scene. Before the debate began, the pros and cons voted, and after the debate, they voted again. Comparing the results of the two votes, the party with increased support rate was the winner. After three hours of heated debate, Ma Kaishuo and Wang Huiyao finally won the debate by a narrow margin.

　　Through deliberate exaggeration and false accusations, McMaster and Bai Bangrui wantonly attacked my domestic and foreign policies.

　　As the positive side of this debate, McMaster and Bai Bangrui, who hold the position that "China will threaten the free international order", mainly hold the following views:

　　First, the West has long pursued a policy of engagement with China, but it has been "cheated" by China. In the past 30 years, based on the assumption that China will not threaten the free international order, but will realize economic and political liberalization, the West has contacted China and invested heavily in it and trained its personnel. However, China is trying to dominate the new international order and rules. When China joined international organizations, it made many promises, but failed to fulfill them. For example, when it joined the World Trade Organization (WTO), it promised to open the market, but then used the market to force foreign companies to transfer technology. It also asked them to support China on issues such as Tibet and Taiwan Province and serve China’s foreign policy. China conducts systematic commercial espionage and steals sensitive technologies and intellectual property rights in key economic sectors and military fields to promote its own economic growth.

　　Second, China’s "dictatorship" has caused "damage" both at home and abroad. China government uses high-tech means to carry out monitoring, build a "police state", suppress ethnic minorities and religious figures and put them in "concentration camps"; Arrest rights lawyers and scholars and suppress the student movement; Strengthen media and news censorship and carry out anti-western propaganda; The establishment of a "social credit system" is essentially to increase the monitoring of the people in various fields. This system not only damages the freedom of people in China, but also damages the freedom of people in other countries. After Meng Wanzhou was arrested on suspicion of bank fraud, China kidnapped two Canadian citizens. The Communist Party of China (CPC) is exposing its "dictatorship" nature every day, and the people of China are increasingly awakening, hoping to escape from China.

　　Third, China exported the "dictatorship" model through the Belt and Road Initiative. Thirty-three countries have suffered unsustainable debts due to the Belt and Road Initiative, and eight countries are in deep crisis, including Venezuela, Ecuador, Cambodia and Zimbabwe. China tried to rebuild the historical tributary system and vassal relationship with China, undermine the sovereignty of other countries and challenge the international order. The United States, Canada, Japan, Australia and New Zealand should adhere to the "high" standard, hedge the "Belt and Road" and provide alternative financing options for other countries. China’s export of "dictatorship" mode is not a matter between China and the United States or between China and Canada, but a competition between a free and open society and a dictatorial closed system.

　　4. China ignores international rules and undermines the free international order. China’s militarization in the South China Sea is aimed at excluding the United States, intimidating regional countries and monopolizing the South China Sea, which violates relevant international laws and rulings of international courts. China’s "National Intelligence Law" requires enterprises to cooperate with the government’s intelligence work and obtain the communication data of the United States and Canada through China Communication Company, which has settled in North America. China’s global communication system poses a threat to data privacy, and any rational government should not allow China to build communication facilities for it. China allowed the export of fentanyl to the United States and Canada, resulting in a large number of deaths in the United States and Canada. The European Commission believes that China is a systemic competitor by pursuing different governance models. China’s neighbors, including Japanese and Indian, also regard China as a threat to the liberal international order. China has increased its defense expenditure and deployed a large number of medium-range missiles without being bound by Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, which has aroused Russian concern. China has also created a crisis of confidence among western countries, making it difficult for them to agree on China.

　　Ma Kaishuo and Wang Huiyao believe that China is the beneficiary and contributor of the international order, and the United States is the destroyer.

　　As the other side of the debate, Ma Kaishuo and Wang Huiyao argued and refuted the "China threat theory" with facts. Their arguments are as follows:

　　1. China is a beneficiary of the liberal international order and does not want to overthrow it. China’s GDP was only 1/10th that of the United States in 1980, but in terms of purchasing power parity, China’s GDP has surpassed that of the United States in 2014. In the past 30 years, China has risen from poverty to the second largest economy in the world, thanks to the free international order. This order has two advantages for China: first, sovereignty, that is, each country can decide its own behavior and future; The second is rules, which determine what can and cannot be done in international affairs. As the world’s largest trading country, if the rules-based international order collapses, China will suffer huge losses, so China has no intention of threatening the free international order. At present, China’s primary concern is to maintain domestic stability and development, not to build new international rules and order. As its strength grows, China’s international influence will inevitably increase, and it hopes to gain more respect. In the past 2000 years, China and India have been the top two economies in the world for the first 1800 years, and the West has only emerged as the leading power in the world in the past 200 years. However, the western countries’ foreign strategic mistakes led to the decline and end of their dominant position. The return and re-emergence of China and India’s strength is a historical necessity, and the West should accept this reality.

　　Second, the United States is the biggest threat to the free international order. The post-war international order dominated by the west has indeed brought benefits to the world, but the danger of collapse facing this order at present is not "homicide", but the "suicide" of the creator. Ma Kaishuo repeatedly quoted his best-selling book "Did the West Fail?" in the debate. The point of view in ". He once pointed out in his book that the West has made three strategic mistakes in the past 30 years: First, it has treated the Islamic world wrongly. Western military forces led by the United States intervened in the internal affairs of many Islamic countries and underestimated the power of Islamic religion, which caused a strong rebound. Second, after the Cold War, the West was immersed in the joy of "the end of history", blindly arrogant, humiliated Russia, and insisted on promoting NATO’s eastward expansion, which stimulated Russian nationalism and led to the rise of political strongman Putin. Third, it did not respect the principle of sovereignty, extended its hand everywhere, promoted Western-style democracy and freedom in many countries around the world, and instigated the "color revolution", which triggered the resentment of non-Western countries against the hegemony of the United States and the West, and also caused the strength of the West to be overdrawn.

　　China is willing to accept major international agreements, cooperate with other countries under the framework of the United Nations, make more contributions to the United Nations, and become a key supporter in tackling climate change, WTO reform and other issues. China is the only big country that has not waged war with foreign countries in the past 40 years. China has the military strength to recover the South Island Reef, but it chooses to abide by the "rules of the game". In contrast, the United States undermined the authority of the United Nations, undermined the operation of the International Atomic Energy Agency, withdrew from the Iranian nuclear agreement, obstructed the WTO reform process, and constantly "retired" and became a country that openly opposed multilateralism. From a military point of view, even in the last year of Obama’s term as President of Peace, the United States dropped 26,000 bombs on seven countries. When there was a dispute between Canada and the United States over the legal status of the Arctic Northwest Passage, the Canadian government was busy producing legal evidence and documents to prove that the relevant waters belonged to Canada, but the United States responded by sending destroyers directly to the waters. Many countries took the United States to the international court of justice when they had disputes with the United States, but the United States chose to ignore the relevant rulings. In this way, the United States sets an example for all countries to abide by international law, and at the same time, it constantly accuses China of violating international law.

　　Large American internet companies like Facebook ignore the rules and often choose the former when weighing profits and protecting users’ privacy. It affected the Brexit referendum and destroyed British democracy by putting lies into user accounts. Therefore, it is very necessary to strengthen supervision. In the free international order, to solve this problem, all countries need to jointly establish multilateral network operating rules, so that big companies such as Facebook and Huawei can act according to the rules. But the first country to oppose this is the United States, because it has the strongest monitoring ability in the world and does not want its own ability to be limited.

　　Third, the United States should listen more to the voices of the whole world and work with China to safeguard a free international order. There are 7.5 billion people in the world, but only 12% live in western countries, and the rest live in non-western countries. Therefore, the western "one-sided view" can’t completely and objectively reflect China’s real international behavior, but also depends on the views of another 88% of the world’s population. In fact, these people welcome the rise of China and are willing to cooperate with China for mutual benefit. The United States may not join the "Belt and Road Initiative", but many countries are waiting in line to join.

　　Small and medium-sized countries all want to uphold international law, and international affairs are decided by neutral institutions, not by superpowers unilaterally. As the United States continues to withdraw from multilateral agreements, what other countries need to do is to jointly safeguard multilateral order. If the United States really wants to maintain a free international order, it should show its sincerity to China and its willingness to strengthen the free international order, and set an example as the world’s number one power, instead of exploiting the loopholes of international law for its own self-interest. Ma Kaishuo in "Did the West Fail? It is pointed out that the West should adopt the "3M" strategy in order to achieve strategic extrication: First, it should adopt Minimalism, fight less and interfere in other countries’ affairs with less force; Second, embrace "Multilateralism", accept the fact that western power is declining, understand the ideas of non-western countries, and cooperate with other countries to strengthen the authority of global multilateral organizations and improve their efficiency; Third, the implementation of "Machiavellianism" and the use of "strategic cunning" to protect long-term interests and create a society that can improve people’s well-being. The biggest problem in the west now is that it doesn’t know itself, and it doesn’t realize that its strength is decreasing.

　　4. Undeniably, China still faces many challenges in improving human rights, but it has made great achievements. Decades ago, people in China had a poor livelihood, and no one even traveled abroad. But now the situation has changed, and the life of China people has greatly improved. Now, there are 134 million outbound tourists every year. However, western countries always look at problems with "black and white" thinking. American human rights standards are indeed higher than China’s, but this does not mean that American society is progressing and China society is regressing. In fact, in the past 30 years, the United States is the only major developed economy where the average income of low-income groups has declined. Two-thirds of American families can’t afford $500 in emergency cash. The United States is also the first developed country to use torture to extract confessions again. Look at Guantanamo.

　　The great debate about China is an intuitive embodiment of the repositioning of the rising China in the West.

　　This debate reflects that major western countries such as the United States and Canada are paying close attention to China’s role and future direction as China’s strength approaches the United States and is poised to surpass it. The debate about China in the whole society is an intuitive embodiment of its repositioning of the rising China, and it is expected that there may be similar debates in the future. At the same time, it also reflects the following specific trends:

　　First, the United States and its major western allies still have a high degree of consensus on the issue of "China threat". Before the debate, the audience voted that the proportion of "China is a threat to the free international order" reached 76%, while that of "is a threat to the free international order" reached 24%, reflecting that the "China threat theory" still has a high degree of identity in Canada and other major US allies. Most of the viewpoints in the debate between McMaster and Bai Bangrui are deliberately exaggerated and false accusations, which shows that the sense of urgency and anxiety in the US strategic community is rising with the narrowing of the strength gap between China and the United States and the expansion of strategic competition. Any move by China to develop its strength, even if it was not intended to be directed at the United States, was regarded as a threat by the United States strategically. For this reason, McMaster and his wife tried their best to play up China’s threat and damage to Canada, divide and alienate China-Canada relations, hold and consolidate the western United front, and rally around me.

　　Second, Canada and other medium-sized countries have a rising sense of confusion in the current evolution of the international structure. At present, the relationship between Canada and China has fallen into a trough because of the Meng Wanzhou case, and at the same time, differences with the United States have increased on many issues such as economy, trade and diplomacy. Canadian society and academic circles hope to clarify Canada’s position and direction in the future international structure through such big debates. With the intensification of the strategic game between China and the United States, there may be more middle-power countries facing the dilemma of whether and how to choose sides between China and the United States, and the debate on the game between China and China and the United States will further heat up.

　　Third, there is still room for public diplomacy and public opinion guidance. Ma Kaishuo’s point of view is supported by both strategic analysis and specific figures, which has had a positive impact on the audience. After the debate, the proportion of the audience who thought that "China is not a threat to the free international order" rose from 24% to 26%.

Notice of the State Council Customs Tariff Commission on Relevant Issues Concerning the Adjustment of Import Duty on Imported Articles

Notice of the State Council Customs Tariff Commission on Relevant Issues Concerning the Adjustment of Import Duty on Imported Articles
Tax Commission [2019] No.17

General Administration of Customs:

With the approval of the State Council, the State Council Customs Tariff Commission decided to adjust the import tax on imported goods. The relevant matters are hereby notified as follows:

First, reduce the tax rates of import tax items 1 and 2 of imported articles to 13% and 20% respectively.

II. Amend the annotation of heading 1 "Drugs" to read "Imported drugs subject to import value-added tax at a reduced rate of 3% as stipulated by the state shall be taxed according to the goods tax rate".

Third, the above adjustments will be implemented as of April 9, 2019.

The adjusted Table of Import Tax Rates for Imported Articles in People’s Republic of China (PRC) is attached.

Attachment: People’s Republic of China (PRC) Import Tax Rate Table for Imported Articles.

The State Council Customs Tariff Commission
April 8, 2019

Attachment download：middleTable of Import Tax Rates for Imported Articles of the People’s Republic of China. pdf

Announcement of the General Administration of Market Supervision on Public Solicitation of Opinions on the Provisions on Centralized Examination of Operators (Draft for Comment)

　　In order to further improve the anti-monopoly legal system and improve the quality and efficiency of centralized anti-monopoly examination of operators, the General Administration of Market Supervision revised the Interim Provisions on Centralized Examination of Operators, and formed the Provisions on Centralized Examination of Operators (Draft for Comment), which is now open to the public for comments. The public can put forward their opinions through the following channels and ways:

　　First, by logging on to the official website of the State Administration of Market Supervision (website: http://www.samr.gov.cn), put forward opinions in the "Solicitation Survey" in the "Interaction" column on the home page.

　　2. Send it to jyzjz@samr.gov.cn by e-mail. The subject of the email should be marked with the words "Provisions on Centralized Examination of Operators for Public Solicitation of Opinions".

　　3. Send it by letter to No.8 Sanlihe East Road, Xicheng District, Beijing (Postal code: 100820). Please indicate on the envelope the words "Provisions on Centralized Examination of Operators for Public Solicitation of Opinions".

　　The deadline for feedback is July 27, 2022.

　　Annex: 1. Provisions on Centralized Examination of Operators (Draft for Comment)

　　2. Explanation on the Provisions on Centralized Examination of Operators (Draft for Comment)

　　General administration of market supervision

　　June 27, 2022

　　Provisions on centralized examination of operators

　　(Draft for Comment)

　　Chapter I General Provisions

　　Article 1 These Provisions are formulated in accordance with the Anti-monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Anti-monopoly Law) and the Provisions of the State Council on the Criteria for Centralized Declaration of Operators, in order to standardize the anti-monopoly examination of business operators.

　　Article 2 The State Administration of Market Supervision (hereinafter referred to as the General Administration of Market Supervision) is responsible for the centralized anti-monopoly review of business operators, and centralized investigation and handling of business operators who violate the law.

　　According to the needs of the work, the General Administration of Market Supervision may entrust the market supervision departments of provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government to carry out centralized examination of operators.

　　Article 3 Concentration of business operators as mentioned in these Provisions refers to the following situations as stipulated in Article 25 of the Anti-monopoly Law:

　　(1) merger of operators;

　　(2) An operator obtains control over other operators by acquiring equity or assets;

　　(3) An operator obtains control over other operators by means of contracts or can exert decisive influence on other operators.

　　Article 4 To determine that an operator has control over other operators or can exert decisive influence on other operators, it shall take into account the fact that the operator directly or indirectly holds voting rights or similar rights and interests of other operators, as well as the influence on the appointment and removal of senior management personnel, financial budget, business plan and other business decisions and management of other operators.

　　To judge whether an operator obtains control over other operators or can exert decisive influence on other operators through transactions, the following factors shall be considered:

　　(a) the purpose of the transaction and future plans;

　　(2) The ownership structure of other operators before and after the transaction and its changes;

　　(3) Voting matters and voting mechanism of other operators’ shareholders’ meetings and other power institutions, as well as their historical attendance rate and voting situation;

　　(4) The composition of decision-making or executive bodies such as the board of directors of other operators and their voting mechanisms;

　　(five) the appointment and removal of senior management personnel of other operators;

　　(six) the relationship between the shareholders and directors of other operators, whether there are entrusted voting rights, concerted action, etc.;

　　(seven) whether there is a major business relationship or cooperation agreement between the operator and other operators;

　　(8) Other factors that should be considered.

　　If two or more operators have control over other operators or can exert decisive influence on other operators, it constitutes joint control over other operators.

　　Article 5 The General Administration of Market Supervision shall treat all operators equally when conducting centralized anti-monopoly review and investigation of operators.

　　Article 6 The General Administration of Market Supervision shall improve the centralized classification and grading examination system for business operators.

　　The General Administration of Market Supervision may formulate specific examination measures for the concentration of operators in important fields such as the national economy and people’s livelihood.

　　The General Administration of Market Supervision regularly evaluates the implementation effect of the centralized review system for operators, so as to improve the quality and efficiency of the review.

　　Chapter II Centralized Declaration by Operators

　　Article 7 Where the concentration of business operators meets the reporting standards stipulated by the State Council (hereinafter referred to as the reporting standards), the business operators shall report to the General Administration of Market Supervision in advance, and the concentration shall not be implemented without reporting or obtaining approval after reporting.

　　Where the concentration of business operators fails to meet the reporting standards, but there is evidence that the concentration of business operators has or may have the effect of eliminating or restricting competition, the General Administration of Market Supervision may require the business operators to declare and notify the business operators in writing. Where concentration has been implemented, the General Administration of Market Supervision may require the operator to make up the report within 180 days.

　　For the concentration of business operators mentioned in the preceding paragraph, business operators shall submit documents and materials to the General Administration of Market Supervision in accordance with Article 14 of these Provisions. If the concentration has not been implemented, the operator shall not implement the concentration without reporting or obtaining approval after reporting; Where concentration has been implemented, the General Administration of Market Supervision may require operators to stop implementing concentration or take other necessary measures.

　　Article 8 Turnover includes the income obtained by relevant operators from selling products and providing services in the previous fiscal year, after deducting relevant taxes and surcharges.

　　The "previous fiscal year" mentioned in the preceding paragraph refers to the fiscal year preceding the signing date of the centralized agreement.

　　Article 9 Operators participating in concentration as mentioned in these Provisions refer to the following operators:

　　(1) Where operators are merged, the parties to the merger are the operators participating in the concentration.

　　(2) If an operator obtains independent control over other operators, or changes from joint control to independent control over other operators, the operator and other operators who have obtained independent control shall be the operators participating in the concentration.

　　(3) An operator obtains joint control over other operators, and all operators and other operators who jointly control the other operators after the transaction are all operators participating in the concentration. However, other operators were originally controlled by a single operator. After the transaction, this operator changed from separate control to joint control over other operators. After the transaction, all operators who jointly control other operators are operators who participate in concentration, and other operators are not operators who participate in concentration.

　　(4) Where the operators establish a new joint venture, the operators who jointly control the new joint venture are the operators who participate in the concentration, and the new joint venture is not the operators who participate in the concentration.

　　(5) If an operator can exert decisive influence on other operators, the operator and other operators shall be the operators participating in the concentration.

　　Article 10 The turnover of an operator participating in concentration shall be the sum of the turnover of the operator and all operators who have direct or indirect control relations with the operator at the time of reporting, but excluding the turnover among the above operators.

　　When an operator acquires a component of another operator, if the transferor no longer has control over the component or cannot exert decisive influence, the turnover of the target operator only includes the turnover of the component.

　　When there are other operators under common control between the operators participating in the concentration or between the operators participating in the concentration and the operators not participating in the concentration, the turnover of the operators participating in the concentration shall include the turnover between the operators under common control and the third-party operators, and this turnover shall be calculated only once.

　　The calculation of the turnover of financial operators shall be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions on the calculation of the turnover of centralized declaration by financial operators.

　　Article 11 The concentration of operators who fail to meet the reporting standards for many times within two years between the same operators shall be regarded as a concentration, and the concentration time shall be counted from the last transaction, and the turnover of the operators participating in the concentration shall be calculated by combining multiple transactions. Operators who carry out the above-mentioned acts through other operators who have control relations with them shall be dealt with in accordance with these provisions.

　　The term "two years" as mentioned in the preceding paragraph refers to the period from the date of completion of the first transaction to the date of signing the agreement for the last transaction.

　　Article 12 The General Administration of Market Supervision shall strengthen the guidance on centralized declaration of business operators. Before the formal declaration, the business operator may put forward specific issues for discussion to the General Administration of Market Supervision in writing on the centralized declaration.

　　Article 13 Concentration of business operators through merger, and all parties to the merger are reporting obligors; Under other circumstances, the operator who is concentrated, obtains control or can exert decisive influence is the declaration obligor, and other operators shall cooperate.

　　If there are more than one declaration obligor in the same business operator, one declaration obligor may be entrusted to declare. If the entrusted declaration obligor fails to declare, other declaration obligors cannot be exempted from the declaration obligation. If the declaration obligor fails to declare, other operators involved in concentration may file a declaration.

　　The declarant may declare by himself or entrust others to declare on his behalf according to law.

　　Article 14 The application documents and materials shall include the following contents:

　　(1) a declaration. The declaration shall specify the name, domicile (place of business), business scope and scheduled date of concentration of the business operators participating in the concentration, and attach the applicant’s identity certificate or registration documents. The overseas applicant shall also submit the notarization documents and relevant authentication documents of the local notary office. Where an agent is entrusted to declare, a power of attorney shall be submitted.

　　(2) An explanation of the impact of concentration on the competition in the relevant market. Including the overview of centralized transactions; Definition of relevant markets; The market share of the operators involved in concentration in the relevant market and their control over the market; Main competitors and their market share; Market concentration; Market entry; Current situation of industry development; The influence of concentration on market competition structure, industry development, technological progress, innovation, national economic development, consumers and other operators; Effect evaluation and basis of concentration on relevant market competition.

　　(3) Centralized agreement. Including various forms of centralized agreement documents, such as agreements, contracts and corresponding supplementary documents.

　　(4) The financial and accounting reports of the operators participating in the concentration in the last fiscal year audited by an accounting firm.

　　(5) Other documents and materials required by the General Administration of Market Supervision.

　　The declarant and the declarant’s agent shall be responsible for the authenticity of the declaration documents and materials.

　　Article 15 The applicant shall mark the business secrets, undisclosed information, confidential business information, personal privacy or personal information in the application documents and materials, and submit the public version and confidential version of the application documents and materials at the same time. The application documents and materials shall be in Chinese.

　　Article 16 The General Administration of Market Supervision shall check the documents and materials submitted by the applicant, and if it finds that the application documents and materials are incomplete, it may require the applicant to make up them within the prescribed time limit. If the applicant fails to pay the overdue fee, it shall be deemed as undeclared.

　　Article 17 If the General Administration of Market Supervision considers that the application documents and materials meet the statutory requirements after verification, it shall formally accept them and notify the applicant in writing from the date of receiving the complete application documents and materials.

　　Article 18 Where the concentration of business operators fails to meet the declaration standards, the business operators who participate in the concentration voluntarily file a declaration of concentration of business operators, and the General Administration of Market Supervision considers it necessary to formally accept the declaration documents and materials after review, it shall review them and make a decision in accordance with the Anti-monopoly Law.

　　Nineteenth in any of the following circumstances, the operator can declare as a summary case, and the General Administration of Market Supervision will review it according to the summary case procedure:

　　(1) In the same relevant market, the sum of the market shares of the operators participating in concentration is less than 15%; In the upstream and downstream markets, the market share of operators participating in concentration is less than 25%; Operators who are not in the same relevant market and have no upstream or downstream relationship have a market share of less than 25% in each market related to transactions;

　　(two) the business operators involved in concentration set up joint ventures outside China, and the joint ventures are not engaged in economic activities in China;

　　(three) the business operators who participate in the concentration purchase the equity or assets of an overseas enterprise, which is not engaged in economic activities in China;

　　(4) A joint venture jointly controlled by two or more operators is controlled by one or more of them through centralization.

　　Twentieth in accordance with the provisions of article nineteenth, but there is one of the following circumstances, not as a summary case:

　　(1) A joint venture jointly controlled by two or more operators is controlled by one of them through centralization, and the operator and the joint venture belong to competitors in the same relevant market, and the total market share is more than 15%;

　　(two) the relevant market involved in the concentration of business operators is difficult to define;

　　(three) the concentration of operators may have adverse effects on market entry, technological progress and innovation;

　　(four) the concentration of business operators may have adverse effects on consumers and other relevant business operators;

　　(five) the concentration of operators may have an adverse impact on the development of the national economy;

　　(6) Other circumstances that the General Administration of Market Supervision considers may adversely affect market competition.

　　Chapter III Centralized Examination of Operators

　　Article 21 The General Administration of Market Supervision shall, within 30 days from the date of formal acceptance, conduct a preliminary examination of the declared business operators, make a decision on whether to implement further examination, and notify the business operators in writing.

　　If the General Administration of Market Supervision decides to implement further review, it shall complete the review within 90 days from the date of decision, make a decision on whether to prohibit the concentration of operators, and notify the operators in writing. In case of compliance with the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 31 of the Anti-monopoly Law, the General Administration of Market Supervision may extend the review period stipulated in this paragraph for a maximum of 60 days.

　　Article 22 In the course of review, in case of any circumstance specified in Article 32 of the Anti-monopoly Law, the General Administration of Market Supervision may decide to suspend the calculation of the review period of concentration of business operators and notify the reporting obligor in writing, and the calculation of the review period shall be suspended from the date of making the decision.

　　The review period shall continue to be calculated from the date when the situation of suspending the calculation of the review period is eliminated. The General Administration of Market Supervision shall make a decision to continue to calculate the review period and notify the reporting obligor in writing.

　　Article 23 In the process of review, if the reporting obligor or other trading party fails to submit documents and materials in accordance with the provisions, which will lead to the failure of the review, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall notify the operators in writing to make corrections within a time limit.

　　If it is really difficult to submit documents and materials within the time limit specified in the notice of the preceding paragraph, the reporting obligor or other parties may explain the reasons to the General Administration of Market Supervision, which may extend the time limit for correction.

　　If the reporting obligor or other trading party fails to submit documents and materials within the time limit for correction, or the documents and materials submitted do not meet the requirements, the General Administration of Market Supervision may make a decision to suspend the calculation of the review period.

　　After the review period is suspended, if the reporting obligor or other trading parties supplement the documents and materials that meet these provisions, so that the obstacles that the review cannot be carried out are eliminated, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall make a decision to continue to calculate the review period.

　　Article 24 In the course of the review, new situations and facts that have a significant impact on the review appear, and the General Administration of Market Supervision needs to verify the relevant situations and facts. If the review cannot be carried out without verification, it may make a decision to suspend the calculation of the review period.

　　If the facts submitted by the reporting obligor in the reporting documents and materials have changed significantly, or other new situations and facts that the reporting obligor knows or should know have a significant impact on the review, it shall take the initiative to report to the General Administration of Market Supervision and supplement the documents and materials.

　　After completing the verification, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall make a decision to continue to calculate the review period.

　　Article 25 If the General Administration of Market Supervision informs the business operators that it is necessary to further evaluate the restrictive conditions attached to the concentration of business operators, the business operators may request to suspend the calculation of the review period. If the General Administration of Market Supervision deems it necessary, it shall agree to the request for suspension and make a decision to suspend the calculation of the review period.

　　Where the General Administration of Market Supervision completes the evaluation and informs the reporting obligor of the evaluation results, it shall make a decision to continue to calculate the review period.

　　Twenty-sixth before the General Administration of Market Supervision makes a review decision, the applicant shall submit a written application and explain the reasons for withdrawing the centralized declaration of business operators. With the consent of the General Administration of Market Supervision, the applicant may withdraw the declaration.

　　If there is a major change in the centralized trading situation or the competition situation in the relevant market and it is necessary to declare again, the applicant shall apply for withdrawal.

　　If the centralized declaration of the operator is withdrawn, the review procedure shall be terminated. The consent of the General Administration of Market Supervision to withdraw the declaration shall not be regarded as the approval of concentration.

　　Article 27 During the review, the General Administration of Market Supervision may, according to the needs of the review, require the applicant to supplement the relevant documents and materials within the prescribed time limit.

　　The applicant can take the initiative to provide relevant documents and materials that will help to review and make decisions on the concentration of business operators.

　　Article 28 During the review process, the business operators participating in concentration may make written statements on the relevant declaration matters to the General Administration of Market Supervision by means of letters, faxes and emails, and the General Administration of Market Supervision shall listen to the statements of the parties concerned.

　　Twenty-ninth in the process of review, the General Administration of Market Supervision may, according to the needs of review, solicit the opinions of relevant government departments, trade associations, operators, consumers and other units or individuals.

　　Thirtieth review of the concentration of business operators, should consider the following factors:

　　(a) the market share of the operators involved in concentration in the relevant market and their control over the market;

　　(2) Market concentration of relevant markets;

　　(three) the impact of the concentration of operators on market entry, technological progress and innovation;

　　(four) the impact of the concentration of operators on consumers and other relevant operators;

　　(five) the impact of the concentration of operators on the development of the national economy;

　　(six) other factors that should be considered to affect market competition.

　　Article 31 To evaluate the competitive impact of concentration of business operators, we can examine the ability, motivation and possibility of relevant business operators to exclude or restrict competition individually or jointly.

　　Where the upstream and downstream markets or related markets are involved, the ability, motivation and possibility of relevant operators to use their control power in one or more markets to exclude or restrict competition in other markets can be investigated.

　　Article 32 To evaluate the market control power of operators participating in concentration, we can consider the market share of operators participating in concentration in relevant markets, the degree of substitution of products or services, the ability to control the sales market or raw material procurement market, financial resources and technical conditions, as well as the market structure of relevant markets, the production capacity of other operators, the purchasing power of downstream customers and the ability to switch suppliers, and the offset effect of potential competitors.

　　To evaluate the market concentration of relevant markets, we can consider the number of operators and market share of relevant markets.

　　Article 33 To evaluate the influence of concentration of operators on market entry, we can consider the influence of operators on market entry by controlling production factors, sales and procurement channels, key technologies, key facilities and data, and consider the possibility, timeliness and sufficiency of entry.

　　To evaluate the influence of operator concentration on technological progress and innovation, we can consider the influence of operator concentration on technological innovation motivation, investment and utilization of technological research and development, and integration of technological resources.

　　Article 34 To evaluate the impact of concentration of business operators on consumers, we may consider the impact of concentration of business operators on the quantity, price, quality and diversification of products or services.

　　To evaluate the impact of concentration of operators on other relevant operators, we can consider the impact of concentration of operators on competitive conditions such as market entry and trading opportunities of operators in the same related market, upstream and downstream markets or related markets.

　　Article 35 To evaluate the impact of concentration of business operators on national economic development, we can consider the impact of concentration of business operators on economic efficiency, business scale and the development of related industries.

　　Article 36 To evaluate the competitive impact of concentration of operators, we can also comprehensively consider the impact of concentration on public interests, whether the operators participating in concentration are enterprises on the verge of bankruptcy and other factors.

　　Article 37 If the General Administration of Market Supervision thinks that the concentration of business operators has or may have the effect of eliminating or restricting competition, it shall inform the applicant and set a reasonable time limit for allowing business operators participating in the concentration to submit written opinions.

　　The written opinions of the operators involved in concentration shall include relevant facts and reasons, and provide corresponding evidence. If the business operators involved in concentration fail to submit written opinions within the time limit, it shall be deemed as no objection.

　　Article 38 In order to reduce the effect of concentration on excluding and restricting competition, the operators participating in concentration may propose a commitment scheme with additional restrictive conditions to the General Administration of Market Supervision.

　　The General Administration of Market Supervision shall evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility and timeliness of the commitment scheme, and notify the applicant of the evaluation results in a timely manner.

　　If the General Administration of Market Supervision thinks that the commitment scheme is not enough to reduce the adverse impact of concentration on competition, it may negotiate with the operators involved in concentration on restrictive conditions and ask them to propose other commitment schemes within a reasonable period of time.

　　Article 39 The restrictive conditions may include the following types according to the specific conditions of centralized transactions of business operators:

　　(1) Structural conditions such as divestiture of tangible assets, intangible assets such as intellectual property rights and data or related rights and interests (hereinafter referred to as divestiture business);

　　(2) Behavioral conditions such as opening its network or platform infrastructure, licensing key technologies (including patents or other intellectual property rights), terminating exclusive agreements, maintaining independent operation, modifying platform rules or algorithms, and promising compatibility or not lowering the level of interoperability;

　　(3) Comprehensive conditions combining structural conditions and behavioral conditions.

　　Generally speaking, the divestiture business should have all the elements needed for effective competition in relevant markets, including tangible assets, intangible assets, equity, key personnel and customer agreements or supply agreements. The divestiture target can be subsidiaries, branches or business departments that participate in centralized operators.

　　Article 40 Where there is a risk that the commitment scheme cannot be implemented, the business operators participating in the concentration may put forward alternative schemes. Alternatives should take effect after the first option cannot be implemented, and the conditions are more stringent than the first option.

　　The commitment scheme is divestiture, but under any of the following circumstances, the operators participating in concentration may propose specific buyers and divestiture time in the commitment scheme:

　　(a) there are great difficulties in stripping;

　　(2) There are great risks in maintaining the competitiveness and marketability of the divestiture business before divestiture;

　　(3) The identity of the buyer has an important influence on whether the divestiture business can resume market competition;

　　(4) Other circumstances deemed necessary by the General Administration of Market Supervision.

　　Article 41 For the concentration of business operators that have or may have the effect of eliminating or restricting competition, the General Administration of Market Supervision may make a decision to approve the additional restrictive conditions if the commitment scheme with additional restrictive conditions proposed by the business operators participating in the concentration can effectively reduce the adverse impact of concentration on competition.

　　Where the operators participating in concentration fail to propose a commitment scheme with additional restrictive conditions within the prescribed time limit, or the proposed commitment scheme cannot effectively reduce the adverse impact of concentration on competition, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall make a decision prohibiting concentration of operators.

　　Article 42 Where there is evidence that the concentration of business operators who fail to meet the reporting standards is suspected to have or may have the effect of eliminating or restricting competition, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall conduct verification and require business operators and relevant parties to provide documents and materials.

　　After verification, if there is evidence that the operators who fail to meet the reporting standards have or may have the effect of eliminating or restricting competition, and the operators declare in accordance with Article 7 of these Provisions, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall conduct a review in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter.

　　Chapter IV Supervision and Implementation of Restrictive Conditions

　　Article 43 For the concentration of business operators approved with additional restrictive conditions, the obligor shall strictly fulfill the obligations stipulated in the review decision, and report the fulfillment of restrictive conditions to the General Administration of Market Supervision as required.

　　The General Administration of Market Supervision may supervise and inspect the obligor’s performance of restrictive conditions by itself or through the trustee. If it passes the supervision and inspection of the trustee, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall make it clear in the review decision. Trustee includes supervision trustee and stripping trustee.

　　The obligor refers to the operator who is required to fulfill the relevant obligations in the review decision of approving the concentration of operators with additional restrictive conditions.

　　Supervisory trustee refers to a natural person, legal person or other organization entrusted by the obligor and determined by the General Administration of Market Supervision, which is responsible for supervising the obligor’s implementation of restrictive conditions and reporting to the General Administration of Market Supervision.

　　The divestiture trustee refers to the natural person, legal person or other organization entrusted by the obligor and determined by the General Administration of Market Supervision, which is responsible for selling the divestiture business at the entrusted divestiture stage and reporting to the General Administration of Market Supervision.

　　Article 44 If the trustee passes the supervision and inspection, the obligor shall submit the supervision trustee to the General Administration of Market Supervision within 15 days from the date when the General Administration of Market Supervision makes the examination decision. If the restrictive condition is divestiture, the obligor shall submit the candidate for divestiture trustee to the General Administration of Market Supervision 30 days before entering the entrusted divestiture stage. The trustee shall meet the following requirements:

　　(a) independent of the obligor and the buyer of the divestiture business;

　　(2) Having a professional team to perform the duties of the trustee, and the team members shall have the professional knowledge, skills and relevant experience needed to supervise the restrictive conditions;

　　(3) Being able to put forward a feasible work plan;

　　(4) It has not been punished in the process of being a trustee in the past five years;

　　(5) Other requirements put forward by the General Administration of Market Supervision.

　　After the General Administration of Market Supervision evaluates and determines the trustee, the obligor shall sign a written agreement with the trustee to clarify their respective rights and obligations, and report to the General Administration of Market Supervision for approval. The trustee shall perform his duties diligently and dutifully. The obligor shall pay remuneration to the trustee and provide necessary support and convenience for the trustee.

　　Article 45 If the additional restrictive condition is divestiture, the divestiture obligor shall, within the time limit specified in the review decision, find a suitable divestiture buyer by himself, sign a sale agreement, and complete the divestiture after reporting to the General Administration of Market Supervision for approval. If the divestiture obligor fails to complete the divestiture within the prescribed time limit, the General Administration of Market Supervision may require the obligor to entrust the divestiture trustee to find a suitable divestiture buyer within the prescribed time limit. The buyer of divestiture business shall meet the following requirements:

　　(a) independent of the operators involved in concentration;

　　(2) Having the necessary resources and capabilities and being willing to use the divestiture business to participate in market competition;

　　(3) Obtaining the approval of other regulatory agencies;

　　(4) It is not allowed to purchase divestiture business by financing from the operators participating in concentration;

　　(five) other requirements put forward by the General Administration of Market Supervision according to the specific circumstances of the case.

　　When the buyer has or can obtain some assets or rights and interests in the divestiture business from other channels, he may apply to the General Administration of Market Supervision for necessary adjustment of the scope of the divestiture business.

　　Article 46 In principle, the obligor shall submit to the General Administration of Market Supervision for examination at least three candidates for supervision trustee, divestiture trustee and divestiture buyer. Under special circumstances, with the consent of the General Administration of Market Supervision, there may be less than three such candidates.

　　The General Administration of Market Supervision shall review the trustee and entrustment agreement, the divestiture buyer and the sale agreement submitted by the obligor to ensure that they meet the requirements of the review decision.

　　If the restrictive condition is divestiture, the time spent in the above review by the General Administration of Market Supervision shall not be included in the divestiture period.

　　Article 47 If the review decision does not stipulate the time limit for self-divestiture, the divestiture obligor shall find a suitable buyer and sign a sale agreement within six months from the date of the review decision. Upon the application of the divestiture obligor and explanation of the reasons, the General Administration of Market Supervision may, at its discretion, extend the period of self-divestiture, but the extension shall not exceed three months.

　　If the review decision does not stipulate the term of entrusted divestiture, the divestiture trustee shall find a suitable buyer and sign a sale agreement within six months from the date of entrusted divestiture.

　　Article 48 The divestiture obligor shall sign a sale agreement with the buyer after the General Administration of Market Supervision has examined and approved the buyer and the sale agreement, and transfer the divestiture business to the buyer within three months from the date of signing, and complete the relevant legal procedures such as ownership transfer. Upon application by the divestiture obligor and explanation of reasons, the General Administration of Market Supervision may extend the term of business transfer as appropriate.

　　Article 49 If the divestiture business purchased by the buyer approved by the General Administration of Market Supervision meets the reporting standards, the operator who has obtained the control right shall report it to the General Administration of Market Supervision as a new operator. Before the General Administration of Market Supervision makes a review decision, the divestiture obligor shall not sell the divestiture business to the buyer.

　　Article 50 Before the divestiture is completed, the divestiture obligor shall perform the following obligations in order to ensure the continuity, competitiveness and marketability of the divestiture business:

　　(1) Maintain the independence between the divestiture business and its reserved business, and take all necessary measures to manage the divestiture business in the most suitable way;

　　(2) Do not commit any acts that may adversely affect the divestiture business, including hiring key employees of the divestiture business and obtaining business secrets or other confidential information of the divestiture business;

　　(3) Designate a special manager to manage the divestiture business. The administrator shall perform his duties under the supervision of the supervisory trustee, and his appointment and replacement shall be agreed by the supervisory trustee;

　　(four) to ensure that potential buyers can obtain sufficient information about the divestiture business in a fair and reasonable way, and evaluate the commercial value and development potential of the divestiture business;

　　(5) Providing necessary support and convenience to the buyer according to his requirements to ensure the smooth handover and stable operation of the stripping business;

　　(6) hand over the stripping business to the buyer in time and perform relevant legal procedures.

　　Article 51 A supervisory trustee shall perform the following duties under the supervision of the General Administration of Market Supervision:

　　(a) to supervise the obligor to fulfill the obligations stipulated in these Provisions, the review decision and the relevant agreements;

　　(2) Evaluate the buyer recommended by the divestiture obligor and the sale agreement to be signed, and submit the evaluation report to the General Administration of Market Supervision;

　　(3) To supervise the implementation of the agreement on the sale of divestiture business and submit supervision reports to the General Administration of Market Supervision on a regular basis;

　　(four) to coordinate the disputes between the stripping obligor and the potential buyer on the stripping matters;

　　(5) Submit other reports related to the obligor’s performance of restrictive conditions as required by the General Administration of Market Supervision.

　　Without the consent of the General Administration of Market Supervision, the supervision trustee shall not disclose all kinds of reports and related information submitted to the General Administration of Market Supervision in the course of performing his duties.

　　Article 52 In the entrusted divestiture stage, the divestiture trustee is responsible for finding a buyer for the divestiture business and reaching a sale agreement.

　　The divestiture trustee has the right to sell the divestiture business without reserve price.

　　Article 53 The examination decision shall stipulate the time limit for attaching restrictive conditions.

　　According to the review decision, if the restrictive conditions are automatically lifted when they expire, the restrictive conditions will be automatically lifted if the obligor does not violate the review decision after verification by the General Administration of Market Supervision. If the obligor violates the review decision, the General Administration of Market Supervision may appropriately extend the time limit for attaching restrictive conditions and announce it to the public in a timely manner.

　　According to the review decision, if the obligor needs to apply for cancellation after the restrictive conditions expire, the obligor shall submit a written application and explain the reasons. If the General Administration of Market Supervision decides to lift the restrictive conditions after evaluation, it shall announce it to the public in a timely manner.

　　The restrictive condition is divestiture. If the obligor fulfills all obligations after verification by the General Administration of Market Supervision, the restrictive condition will be automatically lifted.

　　Article 54 During the effective period of the examination decision, the General Administration of Market Supervision may re-examine, change or terminate the restrictive conditions on its own initiative or at the request of the obligor. If the General Administration of Market Supervision decides to change or lift the restrictive conditions, it shall announce it to the public in a timely manner.

　　When changing or lifting restrictive conditions, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall consider the following factors:

　　(a) whether there are major changes in centralized trading parties;

　　(2) Whether there has been a substantial change in the competitive situation in the relevant market;

　　(3) Whether it is unnecessary or impossible to implement restrictive conditions;

　　(4) Other factors that should be considered.

　　Chapter V Investigation on illegal concentration of business operators

　　Article 55 If the concentration of business operators reaches the declaration standard, and the business operators fail to declare the concentration, or implement the concentration without approval after the declaration, or violate the examination decision, an investigation shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.

　　Operators who fail to meet the reporting standards are concentrated, and if the operators fail to report in accordance with Article 7 of these Provisions, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall conduct an investigation in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter.

　　The term "concentration of implementation" as mentioned in these Provisions refers to the act of gaining control over other operators or exerting decisive influence on them, including but not limited to completing the registration of change of shareholders or rights, appointing senior management personnel, actually participating in business decision-making and management, exchanging sensitive information with other operators, and substantially integrating business.

　　Article 56 Any unit or individual has the right to report to the General Administration of Market Supervision on the suspected illegal concentration of business operators. The General Administration of Market Supervision shall keep confidential the informants.

　　If the report is in written form, and provides the basic information of the informant and the reported person, relevant facts and evidence suspected of illegally implementing the concentration of business operators, etc., the General Administration of Market Supervision shall conduct necessary verification.

　　Article 57 If there are preliminary facts and evidence that show that there is suspicion of illegal concentration of business operators, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall file a case and notify the business operators under investigation in writing.

　　Article 58 The business operators under investigation shall, within 30 days from the date when the notice of filing a case is served, submit to the General Administration of Market Supervision relevant documents and materials, such as whether they belong to the concentration of business operators, whether they meet the reporting standards, whether they declare, whether they are illegally implemented, etc. Where article 19 of these Provisions is involved, it shall be applied by reference.

　　Other operators or individuals involved in the suspected illegal concentration of operators shall provide relevant documents and materials as required and cooperate with the investigation by the General Administration of Market Supervision.

　　Article 59 The General Administration of Market Supervision shall, within 30 days from the date of receiving the documents and materials submitted by the business operators under investigation in accordance with Article 58 of these Provisions, conduct a centralized preliminary investigation on whether the transactions under investigation are illegal.

　　In case of illegal concentration of business operators, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall make a decision on further investigation and notify the business operators under investigation in writing. Business operators should stop illegal activities.

　　If the concentration of business operators is not illegal, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall make a decision not to conduct further investigation and notify the business operators under investigation in writing.

　　Article 60 If the General Administration of Market Supervision decides to conduct further investigation, the operators under investigation shall submit relevant documents and materials to the General Administration of Market Supervision in accordance with the provisions of these Provisions on centralized declaration documents and materials of operators within 30 days from the date of receiving the written notice from the General Administration of Market Supervision.

　　The General Administration of Market Supervision shall complete the further investigation within 120 days from the date of receiving the documents and materials submitted by the investigated business operators that conform to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

　　In the further investigation stage, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall, in accordance with the Anti-monopoly Law and these Provisions, evaluate whether the transaction under investigation has or may have the effect of excluding or restricting competition.

　　Article 61 During the investigation, the business operators and interested parties under investigation have the right to state their opinions. The General Administration of Market Supervision shall verify the facts, reasons and evidence put forward by the operators and interested parties under investigation.

　　Article 62 Before making a decision on administrative punishment, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall inform the business operators under investigation of the facts, reasons and basis for making the decision on administrative punishment.

　　The business operators under investigation shall submit written opinions within the time limit prescribed by the General Administration of Market Supervision. The written opinions shall include relevant facts and evidence.

　　Article 63 The General Administration of Market Supervision shall make a decision on the illegal concentration of business operators according to law and make it public.

　　Article 64 Where the concentration of business operators is illegally implemented and the General Administration of Market Supervision decides to take necessary measures to restore the state before concentration, the supervision and implementation of relevant measures shall be implemented with reference to Chapter IV of these Provisions.

　　Chapter VI Legal Liability

　　Article 65 A business operator who violates the provisions of the Anti-monopoly Law to implement concentration shall be punished in accordance with the provisions of Article 58 of the Anti-monopoly Law.

　　The "previous year" as mentioned in Article 58 of the Anti-monopoly Law refers to the previous fiscal year on the date of the illegal concentration.

　　Article 66 If the declarant conceals relevant information or provides false materials, the General Administration of Market Supervision will not file or cancel the filing of the centralized declaration by the operator, and may impose penalties in accordance with Article 62 of the Anti-monopoly Law.

　　The declaration agent shall examine the declaration documents and materials, and shall be punished in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph if it conceals relevant information or provides false materials. If the circumstances are serious, the General Administration of Market Supervision may decide not to accept the declaration of its agent.

　　Article 67 When determining the specific fine amount according to the Anti-monopoly Law and Articles 65 and 66 of these Provisions, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall, in accordance with the requirements of Article 59 of the Anti-monopoly Law, consider the nature, extent, duration of the illegal act and the situation of eliminating the consequences of the illegal act.

　　Where a party voluntarily reports an illegal act that has not been mastered by the General Administration of Market Supervision, or voluntarily eliminates or mitigates the harmful consequences of the illegal act, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall, according to Article 32 of the Administrative Punishment Law, give a lighter or mitigated punishment as appropriate.

　　Article 68 Where the General Administration of Market Supervision imposes administrative penalties on business operators in accordance with the Anti-monopoly Law and Articles 65 and 66 of these Provisions, it shall be recorded in the credit records in accordance with Article 64 of the Anti-monopoly Law and relevant provisions of the State and publicized to the public.

　　Article 69 If the trustee fails to perform his duties as required, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall order him to make corrections; If the circumstances are serious, the obligor may be required to replace the trustee, and the trustee may be fined not more than 200,000 yuan.

　　Article 70 If the buyer of the divestiture business fails to fulfill its obligations according to the regulations, which affects the implementation of restrictive conditions, the General Administration of Market Supervision shall order it to make corrections and may impose a fine of less than 200,000 yuan.

　　Article 71 In case of violation of Chapter IV of the Anti-monopoly Law and these Provisions, if the circumstances are particularly serious, the impact is particularly bad, and the consequences are particularly serious, the General Administration of Market Supervision may determine the amount of the fine in Articles 58 and 62 of the Anti-monopoly Law and Articles 65 and 66 of these Provisions.

　　Article 72 Any functionary of an anti-monopoly law enforcement agency who abuses his power, neglects his duty, engages in malpractices for selfish ends or divulges state secrets, business secrets, personal privacy and personal information that he has learned in the course of law enforcement shall be dealt with in accordance with relevant regulations.

　　During the investigation, the anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies found clues about public officials’ duty violations and duty crimes, and should promptly hand them over to the discipline inspection and supervision organs with jurisdiction.

　　Chapter VII Supplementary Provisions

　　Article 73 The General Administration of Market Supervision and other units and individuals shall be obliged to keep confidential the known business secrets, undisclosed information, confidential business information, personal privacy and personal information, except those that should be disclosed according to laws and regulations or with the prior consent of the obligee.

　　Article 74 In the process of examination or investigation, the General Administration of Market Supervision may organize a hearing. The hearing procedure shall be implemented in accordance with the Interim Provisions on the Procedures for Administrative Licensing of Market Supervision and Administration and the Measures for Hearing Administrative Punishment of Market Supervision and Administration.

　　Article 75 For written documents that need to be delivered to business operators, the delivery method shall be implemented with reference to the Provisions on Administrative Punishment Procedures for Market Supervision and Administration.

　　Article 76 These Provisions shall come into force as of _ _ _ 2022.

　　Explanation on the Provisions on Centralized Examination of Operators (Draft for Comment)

　　Supporting the Anti-Monopoly Law (Amendment), the General Administration of Market Supervision revised the Interim Provisions on Centralized Examination of Operators (hereinafter referred to as the Interim Provisions) and formed the Provisions on Centralized Examination of Operators (Draft for Comment) (hereinafter referred to as the Provisions). The relevant information is as follows:

　　First, the necessity of revision

　　(A) the inherent requirements of strengthening the supply of basic systems.The Anti-monopoly Law (Amendment) puts forward higher requirements for further improving the centralized review system of operators, including improving the centralized classification and grading review system of operators, adding the centralized stop system of operators, improving the review and investigation of operators who fail to meet the reporting standards, and strengthening the legal responsibility for illegally implementing the centralized behavior of operators. As a supporting regulation, it is necessary to revise and implement the relevant requirements of the Anti-Monopoly Law (Amendment) to provide a fair, transparent and predictable institutional environment for market participants.

　　(two) to adapt to the objective needs of economic development and market operation.China has become a super-large-scale market with a total economic output of 114 trillion, 150 million market participants and 1.4 billion consumers. The degree of marketization and participation in global economic globalization have undergone profound changes, and the competition and cooperation of market forces have been profoundly adjusted. Strengthen the centralized anti-monopoly review of operators, give full play to the function of prevention in advance, effectively prevent enterprises from distorting the market competition structure through mergers and acquisitions, resulting in the effect of eliminating and restricting competition, shift regulatory resources from stopping monopoly to preventing monopoly, improve regulatory efficiency, and prevent the loss of overall social welfare due to monopolistic behavior.

　　(3) The inevitable requirement of promoting the construction of a high-standard market system.Since the implementation of the centralized anti-monopoly review system for business operators in China, it has been committed to improving the quality and efficiency of the review, and has played a role in helping enterprises optimize and reorganize, transform and upgrade their economies, and safeguard the interests of consumers. Through this revision, we will further standardize and optimize the process of centralized anti-monopoly declaration and review by operators, improve the quality and efficiency of law enforcement, reduce the burden on operators, continuously stimulate market vitality and social creativity, and make centralized anti-monopoly review by operators better serve the high-quality development of our economy and society.

　　Second, the main principles of the revision

　　(1) Implementing the spirit of the revision of the anti-monopoly law.Accurately grasp the latest institutional requirements of the Anti-Monopoly Law, focus on the relevant requirements and provisions of the Anti-Monopoly Law on improving the centralized examination system for operators, and make a good connection with the superior law system.

　　(2) Adhere to the problem orientation.Summarize the experience of centralized review of operators, respond to the problems reflected in practice, such as the definition of operators participating in concentration and the judgment of implementing concentration, and enhance the transparency of the system of centralized rules for operators.

　　(3) Adhere to service development.Improve the centralized classification and grading review system for operators, optimize the centralized anti-monopoly review process for operators, and improve the quality and efficiency of review. Refine the clock-stopping system, enhance the operability and predictability of the legal system, reduce the institutional cost of enterprises, and create a fair and predictable institutional environment.

　　(4) Insist on eclecticism.On the basis of extensively soliciting opinions from all parties, we will compare and study the experience and practices of other jurisdictions, and learn from the latest developments of legislative enforcement in other jurisdictions to ensure the scientific and effective legal system.

　　Third, the main work carried out

　　In accordance with the requirements of scientific legislation, democratic legislation, legal legislation and open-door legislation, the General Administration of Market Supervision has solidly promoted the revision work through legislative research, theoretical research and soliciting opinions.

　　The first is to carry out legislative research.Comprehensively sort out the practical experience of centralized review of operators in China, and strengthen the research on the new trend of centralized review system and law enforcement cases of operators in major foreign jurisdictions, and refine and summarize mature experiences and practices.

　　The second is organizational theory research.Entrust experts from the Expert Advisory Group of the State Council Anti-monopoly Committee to carry out research on the optimization of centralized anti-monopoly review system for operators, so as to provide theoretical guarantee for revision.

　　The third is to fully listen to the opinions of all parties.Widely solicit opinions from relevant departments, experts and scholars, law firms and enterprises.

　　IV. Main contents of the revision

　　There are 65 existing Interim Provisions, and this revision has revised 22 articles, added 12 articles and deleted 1 article, making a total of 76 articles. The revised contents mainly involve the following six aspects:

　　(1) The system of stopping the clock during the period of centralized review by operators.According to the relevant provisions of the Anti-monopoly Law (Amendment), the detailed rules such as starting conditions, recovery conditions and application procedures are formulated in view of the three situations in which the calculation period of centralized review of operators is suspended.

　　(two) review and investigation on the concentration of operators who do not meet the reporting standards.According to the Anti-Monopoly Law (Amendment), if the concentration of business operators fails to meet the reporting standards, but there is evidence to prove that it has or may have the effect of excluding or restricting competition, the General Administration of Market Supervision may require the business operators to declare. The "Regulations" further clarify that the supporting provisions of the review or investigation procedures are applicable to operators who declare or not declare as required.

　　(three) on the illegal implementation of centralized investigation of operators.The first is to further clarify the concept of "implementation concentration". The second is to stipulate the obligation of the third party to cooperate with the investigation. Third, if the General Administration of Market Supervision decides to take necessary measures to restore the pre-concentration state for illegal concentration of business operators, the relevant measures shall be supervised and implemented with reference to additional restrictive conditions.

　　(four) on the substantive standards and procedural provisions.The first is to clarify the definition of "operators participating in concentration" and the entity standards such as the previous fiscal year. The second is to change the "filing" procedure of centralized anti-monopoly declaration by operators into the "formal acceptance" procedure.

　　(five) on improving the quality and efficiency of the review.First, it is proposed to improve the centralized classification and grading review system for operators, strengthen law enforcement in important areas such as the national economy and people’s livelihood, and regularly evaluate the review effect. The second is to enrich the types of additional restrictive conditions, include data stripping into structural conditions, and include maintaining independence, modifying platform rules or algorithms, and not reducing interoperability into behavioral conditions.

　　(6) About legal liability.First, the legal responsibility of the declaration agent is increased, and the illegal responsibility of concealing or providing false materials is clarified. If the circumstances are serious, the General Administration of Market Supervision may decide not to accept the declaration of its agent. Second, according to the Anti-Monopoly Law (Amendment), the amount of fines for illegal concentration of business operators, refusal and obstruction of law enforcement has been increased. The third is to strengthen the legal responsibility of the trustee and the buyer of the divestiture business for failing to fulfill their obligations as required.

Headquarters exclusively investigates the pursuit of ＂ghost guns＂ in the United States： Why did 3D printing guns become ＂outlaws＂？

　　In the United States, the first Friday of June is designated as "National Anti-Gun Violence Day" to commemorate the victims and survivors of gun violence. The United States is the country with the most serious gun violence in the world. According to the real-time data of the non-profit organization "Gun Violence Archives", as of May 31, local time, in 2023, 17,650 people in the United States had been killed by shootings, and the number of mass shootings reached 268, equivalent to an average of 1.8 per day. And this number is rising year by year.

　　The Second Amendment of the American Constitution gives citizens the right to keep and carry weapons. The ease of buying guns in the United States has become a strange phenomenon. People can even buy guns in supermarkets and bullets in vending machines. However, in recent years, a new kind of gun is challenging the already very weak gun management regulations in the United States: "ghost gun", a weapon that can be assembled by itself without any license, can not be tracked, and even at home. What is a "ghost gun", who is making it, and who is using it? Let’s look at the investigation report brought by Liu Xiaoqian, a CCTV reporter in the United States: "Ghost Gun Chasing the Murder".

　　"Ghost Gun" party scans American 3D printing gun crowd

　　Amid the incessant gunfire in the United States, a new threat is quietly appearing.

　　The "ghost gun" is actually visible and tangible, so it is named because it has no serial number of the gun and cannot be tracked by law enforcement agencies. At the same time, this ghostly existence is flooding the network. People can mail-order gun parts at will, even people without foundation can assemble them themselves, and even a USB flash drive can print a gun in 3D.

　　US President Biden:Whether it is a terrorist or a domestic abuser, it takes only 30 minutes from obtaining gun parts to assembling a gun.

　　According to the data of the US Department of Justice, in 2021, the number of "ghost guns" seized by the US police at the crime scene reached 20,000, 12 times that of 2017.

　　Why can the "ghost gun" escape the supervision of American law? And can the lethality of a 3D printing gun be comparable to that of ordinary guns?

　　We went to Florida to find out.

　　What will be held here is the only 3D printing gun competition in the United States. We started to contact the organizers through different channels six months ago, but we finally got permission to shoot on the eve of the competition.

　　CCTV reporter Liu Wei:Before the official start of the competition, the organizers are making some safety instructions and introductions. Some of them are only about one year old, and they all started with 3D printing guns.

　　The competition is divided into three categories: pistol, rifle and carbine. Among the contestants, there are amateurs and representatives of companies specializing in the production and sale of 3D printed guns.

　　Reporter:The yellow part is printed in 3D?

　　3D printing gun enthusiast Dell:Yes, you can see its lines if you get closer.

　　Reporter:What material is it printed with?

　　3D printing gun enthusiast Dell:It is made of polylactic acid, which is printed layer by layer, and the printing time takes 2 to 4 days.

　　Reporter:What about the rest of the gun parts?

　　3D printing gun enthusiast Dell:You can buy the remaining gun parts online or in gun shops.

　　Reporter:Is this your first 3D printing gun?

　　3D printing gun enthusiast Dell:This is my first 3D printing gun, and it is also my first rifle. I only bought a pistol before.

　　Reporter:So you have no experience in 3D printing guns before. Is it difficult to make this gun?

　　3D printing gun enthusiast Dell:I watched some videos on the internet that taught people to assemble guns, especially the part of getting off the gun box, which lasted more than an hour. After reading it, I thought it should be no problem and decided to make my own gun.

　　A gun consists of different parts, which can be metal or plastic. According to the current federal law of the United States, only the lower gun box is the decisive part of a gun. Once the gun box has holes for connecting and fixing other parts, it is recognized as a gun. On the contrary, it is just a piece of metal. The "ghost gun" is wandering in the gray area of this law.

　　3D printing gun manufacturer Jordan:This is an "80% gun magazine". It is only 80% completed. According to federal law, it is not a gun. This is the state when we sold it. You see, this is a completely processed lower gun box with holes in it. There is no problem if the customer drills the hole himself. If I drill the hole in the gun box and give it to you or sell it to you, it is equivalent to manufacturing guns. I need to apply for a license, and as a customer, you also need to do identity examination.

　　In fact, the magazine can also be obtained through 3D printing. One of the sponsors of the competition, the Texas-based "Distributed Defense" company provides a USB flash drive with a price of only $11, and customers can get the print data of various rifle magazines.

　　Reporter:How long does it take you to print out this rifle?

　　Brian, a manufacturer of 3D printing guns:The magazine was printed for 24 hours, the grip was printed for 15 hours and the cushion was printed for 6 to 8 hours.

　　CCTV reporter Liu Wei:Although the guns are printed in 3D, they all use traditional bullets. These are large caliber bullet casings that we found at the scene. In the process of watching, we also found that not all guns can be used normally, and some faults often occur.

　　3D printing gun enthusiast Ben:The previous bullet got stuck and failed to shoot, at the same time, the next bullet automatically entered the gun chamber.

　　At present, there are more than 80 companies that manufacture and sell "ghost guns" in the United States. Anyone can place an order without showing his identity documents, which means that the other end of the network may be a fan of 3D printing guns or a planner of mass shootings.

　　Reporter:As a seller of 3D printing guns, do you think we should do some basic customer identity checks?

　　3D printing gun manufacturer Jordan:I think there are many laws that restrict bad guys from getting guns. If a person prints guns just for his own use, I don’t think there is any problem.

　　Edgar Andyon, Organizer of 3D Printing Gun Competition:The "ghost gun" is just an object. Objects don’t do bad things. People use objects to do bad things.

　　Reporter:Do you think there is any way to prevent the "ghost gun" from falling into the wrong hands?

　　Edgar Andyon, Organizer of 3D Printing Gun Competition:I think this question is wrong. What you’re asking is actually how to prevent the bad guys from doing bad things. It’s very difficult, just like looking for a needle in a haystack. We can’t tell who the bad guys are from the crowd. This is a wrong direction.

　　The murderous 3D printing gun is the perfect crime weapon?

　　Anyone can place an order to buy, even people with zero foundation can teach themselves to make guns. While 3D printing gun technology brings fun to gun lovers, will it create more security risks for American society that is deeply poisoned by gun violence?

　　Many manufacturers of 3D printing guns insist that this self-assembled gun is the least likely weapon to be used by criminals.

　　Brian, a manufacturer of 3D printing guns:It takes you several days to print and assemble a gun. If a criminal needs to use a gun, they won’t waste time assembling it, but just buy a cheap and stolen gun.

　　However, a series of shootings have proved that the opposite is true. California is one of the most frequent areas of "ghost gun" violence. The local police said that more than half of the guns seized at the crime scene in recent years were "ghost guns".

　　CCTV reporter Liu Wei:Every year in mid-June, large-scale gun control demonstrations are held all over the United States. This is Grand Park in downtown Los Angeles, and one of the people calling for this activity is the victim of the "ghost gun".

　　Mia Tretta, Survivor of the "Ghost Gun" Campus Shooting;At that time, we were talking and laughing when we suddenly heard a gunshot. When the second gunshot sounded, I had fallen to the ground. I got up and ran into the classroom. My classmates and teachers rushed to stop the bleeding for me. I was shot by an unknown classmate and a minor with a .45 caliber "ghost gun".

　　Mia Tretta is from Santa Cralli Tower in Southern California. In November 2019, a large-scale shooting happened in her middle school. A classmate pulled out a "ghost gun" from his backpack and shot at the crowd, causing five injuries to two dead.

　　CCTV reporter Liu Wei:The shooter at Sagos High School was only 16 years old. The weapon he used was a 3D printed .45 caliber semi-automatic pistol. Because the gun has no serial number, the police can’t determine its source and the time when it was made.

　　The minimum age for holding a gun in California is 21. Because the murderer committed suicide after the attack, the police can’t determine who bought and assembled the "ghost gun".

　　Less than five months after the shooting, the father of Grace Mulberg, one of the victims, successfully ordered a set of gun parts for the "ghost gun" in the name of his dead daughter. He shared this experience in Washington post to expose the darkness of the "ghost gun" industry.

　　In November, 2017, 44-year-old Kevin Neil killed his wife and neighbors in Lanciotti Black Horse Reserve in Northern California. He then drove into a local primary school and fired more than 100 bullets into the classroom, killing 5 people and injuring 18 others.

　　Jonathan Loy, the attorney for the victims of the dark horse shooting in Lanciotti and the founder of the anti-gun organization "International Action on Gun Violence":The murderer was not allowed to buy and own guns because he had a criminal record, but he got guns from the seller of "ghost guns" and killed people crazily.

　　Whether it is a teenager under the age of holding a gun or a felon who is deprived of the qualification to buy a gun, the "ghost gun" has given them a green light without distinction.

　　Reporter:Why is the "ghost gun" the perfect weapon for criminals?

　　Jonathan Loy, the attorney for the victims of the dark horse shooting in Lanciotti and the founder of the anti-gun organization "International Action on Gun Violence":It is very simple to get a gun legally in the United States. There are more gun shops than coffee shops and chain fast food restaurants in the United States. The main target market of "ghost guns" is those who cannot legally get guns.

　　A hole apart, 3D printing gun, haunted by ghosts.

　　There is a hole in the gun box part, which is a gun. Without a hole, it is just a piece of metal. American gun laws are not only full of loopholes, but also far behind the development of the times and technology. The federal government of the United States tried to "slam the brakes" on the control of "ghost guns", but did it have the expected effect?

　　3D printing can be traced back to the 1980s, and now people have used this technology to make furniture, food and even medical prostheses.

　　In 2013, Cody Wilson, the inventor of the American 3D printing gun, completely published a 3D printing data named "Savior" pistol on the Internet for the first time, with 100,000 downloads.

　　Today, ten years later, supporters of 3D printing guns have spread all over the United States.

　　Rob pincus, a well-known American gun advocate:We want to show the outside world that many people in the gun group are passionate about 3D printing guns, and this momentum is becoming more and more obvious. In recent years, the group of self-made guns has grown stronger and stronger, and with the support of the industry, we find that the traditional gun industry has gradually accepted this.

　　Rob pincus used to be a policeman and a gun instructor, but now his focus has shifted to 3D printing guns, and he has frequently endorsed "ghost guns" on TV programs and from the media.

　　Rob pincus, a well-known American gun advocate:Every gun victim should realize that the injury is not caused by the gun itself, but by the person who uses the gun, and the violence is caused by the person. I don’t think the victims or their families care whether they are 3D printed guns, guns assembled by children or traditional guns obtained through illegal or private channels.

　　The victims of ghost guns obviously can’t accept this defense.

　　Mia Tretta, Survivor of the "Ghost Gun" Campus Shooting;("Ghost Gun") is designed to take advantage of loopholes in the law and go beyond the original regulations to ensure our safety. I stand here to tell you that the loopholes in the law are as wide as the Grand Canyon, and the existing gun laws and regulations are far from enough.

　　In April 2022, the US Department of Justice issued a new regulation, which listed the "ghost gun" kit as a weapon recognized by federal law. However, this regulation is difficult to implement in practice. In March 2023, a federal judge in Texas temporarily suspended the regulations on the grounds that the new regulations were suspected of breaking the law. Several "ghost gun" companies, including "distributed defense", immediately resumed sales.

　　Rob pincus, a well-known American gun advocate:I don’t think adding 3D printing guns or making laws and regulations in the field of homemade weapons will improve the situation. If it becomes more difficult, more money is needed, more background checks are needed, and more procedures are added, fewer and fewer people will make their own guns, and fewer and fewer gun owners will be more educated and responsible.

　　Reporter:Many people think that strengthening legal provisions will harm the interests of responsible gunmen.

　　Jonathan Loy, founder of the anti-gun organization "International Action on Gun Violence":Responsible gunmen also fully support selling guns in the right way to prevent guns from falling into the wrong hands; Responsible gunmen also agree that guns should have serial numbers to provide information for law enforcement agencies. Buyers should do background checks. Many polls show that most people with guns fully support better gun laws.

　　The "ghost gun" not only gradually broke free from the French Open, but also showed a more fierce side. 3D printing guns without metal parts may escape the security inspection equipment in public places such as airports, creating possibilities for crimes and terrorist attacks.

　　Jonathan Loy, founder of the anti-gun organization "International Action on Gun Violence":I think the 3D printing gun market may provide convenience for the criminal market, and it will be a potential problem to make guns with 3D printers and provide them to criminal groups.

　　According to the police records of many States in the United States, mass production of 3D printed guns for criminal groups has become a new trend in the black market of weapons.

　　Rob pincus, a well-known American gun advocate:The printing data of 3D guns is on the Internet, and 3D printers are readily available. The momentum of people printing guns is unstoppable.

　　After a whole day’s heat and tympanic membrane stimulation, the contestants voted for the champions of various gun types, but who is the real winner in this "ghost gun" chase?

RAV4 Rongfang in Tianjin is being discounted! Lowest price 132,800, great discount today

Welcome to the Autohome Tianjin Promotion Channel to bring you the latest car market trends. Currently, a high-profile promotion is underway, providing consumers in Tianjin with real car purchase benefits. It is understood that the maximum discount limit is an amazing 41,000 yuan, which means that consumers can get this popular SUV at a lower price. The minimum selling price has been adjusted to 132,800 yuan, bringing consumers excellent cost performance. To seize this promotion opportunity, click the "Check Car Price" button in the quotation form and let our professional team help you get a more competitive car purchase price!

天津地区RAV4荣放正在优惠！最低售价13.28万，今日钜惠

With its unique exterior design, the RAV4 presents a distinct sense of style and power. The front face features a delicate trapezoidal air intake grille, paired with sharp LED headlights, to show a strong visual impact. The body lines are smooth, and the overall style is both sporty and stable, reflecting Toyota’s unique interpretation of the aesthetics of urban SUVs.

天津地区RAV4荣放正在优惠！最低售价13.28万，今日钜惠

The side lines of the car series RAV4 Rongfang are elegantly designed, and the streamlined body gives it a dynamic appearance. Its body size is 4600mm x 1855mm x 1685mm, and the wheelbase reaches 2690mm, which makes the interior spacious and the driving stability is excellent. The front wheelbase is 1605mm, and the rear wheelbase is 1620mm. This reasonable wheelbase distribution provides a good driving balance. The tire size is 225/60 R18, which is unified from front to rear, which not only guarantees driving performance, but also shows a touch of refinement and technology. Overall, the side design of the RAV4 Rongfang reflects both practicality and fine details.

天津地区RAV4荣放正在优惠！最低售价13.28万，今日钜惠

The interior design of the RAV4 Rongfang is mainly simple and practical, with exquisite craftsmanship details. The steering wheel is made of genuine leather, which provides a comfortable feel and a good grip. It supports manual up and down + front and rear adjustment, which is convenient for drivers to adjust according to their needs. A large 10.25-inch screen stands on the center console, which integrates multimedia systems, navigation, phone and air conditioning controls, as well as wireless charging function of mobile phones, which is convenient for users to operate and charge. In terms of seats, imitation leather materials are used. The main and passenger seats are equipped with front and rear, backrest, high and low and waist support adjustments. The front seats also provide additional heating functions to ensure passenger comfort. The second row of seats supports backrest adjustment, while the seat reclining function supports proportional reclining, providing flexibility for luggage space. The overall interior design takes into account the sense of technology and humanization, creating a warm and comfortable interior environment.

天津地区RAV4荣放正在优惠！最低售价13.28万，今日钜惠

In the RAV4 Rongfang model, we are equipped with a 2.5L four-cylinder engine with a maximum power of 131 kilowatts, providing abundant power support. With an output of 178 horsepower, this engine, coupled with the E-CVT continuously variable transmission, ensures a smooth driving experience and excellent fuel economy. Whether it is a city commute or a long drive, you can feel the strong performance and stability of this engine.

Overall, as the Autohome owner said, the RAV4 Rongfang, with its unique exterior design and balanced sense of movement, both visually domineering and inherently youthful style, has made it resonate with owners of different ages. The interior and exterior of this model are undoubtedly one of the key factors for its wide popularity in the market.

Di Lizheba： Revealing the story behind the self-introduction of the freshmen in the play

[Time]: August 22, 2024 [Location]: Shanghai Academy of Drama [Character]: Di Lizheba [Event]: Di Lizheba’s early stage drama freshman self-introduction [Background]: Di Lizheba, a Chinese mainland film and television actress, is loved by audiences for her unique exotic style and excellent acting skills. This time, we will uncover the mystery of her early self-introduction as a freshman of Shanghai Academy of Drama.

[Purpose and Intention]: This article aims to review the starting point of Di Lizheba’s acting career, and to show the growth process of this popular actress by recreating the self-introduction of her freshmen at the Shanghai Theater Academy, providing readers with an opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of Di Lizheba and arousing public attention to art education.

[Key information]:

Di Lizheba’s performance in the self-introduction of the freshmen in the play
The environment, atmosphere and the reaction of classmates at that time
Self-introduction content and reflected personal characteristics
The impact on his subsequent acting career

[Text]:

Prologue: The First Starlight

Back in time, the campus of the Shanghai Theater Academy was filled with the breath of youth, and the freshmen with dreams stepped onto the stairs leading to the palace of art. Among them, a girl named Di Lizheba, with the unique exotic atmosphere of Xinjiang, stepped into this institution that gave birth to many performing arts talents. Her arrival was like a bright new star, quietly rising in the night sky of the theater.

Chapter 1: Self-declaration on stage

The first lesson for freshmen was that unique self-introduction. When Di Lizheba stepped onto the podium, she looked nervous and excited under the spotlight. Her eyes shone with determination, and the corners of her mouth outlined a confident smile. Facing hundreds of pairs of expectant eyes in the audience, she began a crucial self-explanation in her life.

"Hello everyone, I’m Dilizheba Dilimurati from Urumqi, Xinjiang."

The short but powerful opening remarks instantly attracted the attention of the audience. She recounted her growing experience, from the vastness of the grassland to the prosperity of the city, from the love of folk dance to the persistent pursuit of performing arts. Her words were full of love for life and longing for the future. That sincerity and enthusiasm blew through the hearts of everyone present like a breeze.

Chapter 2: Unique Charm, Emerging

In the process of self-introduction, Di Lizheba showed a unique personal characteristic. She not only has a natural beauty, but also exudes a temperament from the inside out. Her voice is like a flowing stream, clear and beautiful; her demeanor is elegant and generous, as if she has a stage halo. When she talks about her understanding of the performing arts, the enthusiasm for deep digging of characters and the professional attitude of delicate interpretation of the script made the teachers and students present all admire.

"I want to be an actor who can move people’s hearts, tell stories with characters, and convey emotions with performances."

This is her vow in her self-introduction, and it is also a true portrayal of her acting career. At that moment, Di Lizheba was no longer the young freshman, but the shining star of tomorrow on the stage.

Chapter 3: Far-reaching Impact, Laying the Foundation

This self-introduction undoubtedly laid a solid foundation for Di Lizheba’s acting career. It not only showcased her talent and potential, but also won the recognition of her teachers and the admiration of her classmates. Since then, she has received more attention and support in her study and life in acting, as well as more opportunities for practical exercise.

Many years later, when we look back at Di Lizheba’s road to fame, it is not difficult to find that it was this freshman self-introduction that opened the door to her brilliant acting career. It was like a stepping stone, knocking on the door of the art hall, allowing her to step towards a bright star in the years to come.

Epilogue: Star-studded, the future is promising

Today’s Di Lizheba has long been a household name in film and television, but the moment she introduced herself as a freshman at the Shanghai Theater Academy is still as vivid as yesterday. It was the mark of her original intention, the place where her dream set sail, and the precious moment when we witnessed her go from ordinary to extraordinary.

Let’s look back at that history, walk into Di Lizheba’s inner world, feel the love and dedication to art, and appreciate the unique charm. Perhaps this is the secret of her being unique in the entertainment industry and loved by the majority of audiences.

[Conclusion]: Di Lizheba’s self-introduction is not only an important node in her personal acting career, but also an inspiration for all young people who have dreams and the courage to pursue them. It tells us that as long as there is a dream in our hearts and a path under our feet, everyone can shine on their own stage.

Responsible editor:

Chen He Weibo responds to ＂divorce＂ rumors： life gathers less and leaves more

Screenshot of Chen He Weibo

　　Responding to recent divorce rumors on Weibo, Chen He apologized that "I was wrong" and that "I didn’t maintain this family well."

　　The original text of Weibo is as follows:

　　I was wrong!

　　Please spare us, three days of violent storms, madness and collapse that I have never experienced before.

　　I’m sorry I hid my divorce from everyone.

　　It has been almost half a year since Xu Jing and I signed the divorce agreement. We broke up peacefully, nothing else.

　　14 years of relationship is not easy, really not easy. It’s beautiful, precious, and important. But really, nothing in this world can be so perfect. We all work hard to make this family better, but because our lives are getting farther and farther away, my work is getting more and more busy. Many things really make it impossible for you to maintain.

　　I took at most ten days off for the whole year last year. A lot of work is undeniable, too much worldly sophistication. At most 3 scenes are stuck. Let alone going home, it’s hard for me to even take a look at her. It’s unfair to her. There is very little communication between us at the very least. These are all my fault.

　　In fact, I shouldn’t say this. Every family has a difficult scripture to read. I believe that all those who have been in love will understand. Every relationship cannot be perfect. It must be the dedication and sacrifice of two people. But if you can’t persevere and get tired, if you persevere, it will become a kind of pain and suffering. Do you want to continue? Do you have to continue? Sometimes letting go is not necessarily the worst choice. This decision is very difficult, really difficult. It’s really, really painful. We have mustered up a lot of courage to continue our lives. We are really exhausted and really want to live like an ordinary person. I really hope so much!! Please don’t say any more! Please don’t disturb her and give her a personal space. She is not from this circle.

　　We broke up not for any other reason, but because I didn’t maintain this family well! It’s my fault!

　　Please! I don’t have any ambitions! I don’t want to threaten anyone either. One show and one movie pushed me to this point, which is what I never expected. I wanted to do a good comedy from the beginning of acting, bring happiness to everyone, and make everyone happy! Happy! Happy! I’m really just an ordinary person!!

　　I just got divorced and didn’t do anything to hurt the world. So many fake news are overwhelming, like a net pressing down on me like a mountain. These three days, I admit to being the darkest and most terrifying three days of my life. I really can’t take it anymore!! I’m sorry! Please give me a little space! A little privacy! I respect everyone, and please give me the last little bit of respect! My parents are also about to collapse, because the stress of these days is seriously debilitating, and I’m really about to collapse. If you can’t accept it, I can finish the job I’m taking now and stop acting. I’m really just an ordinary person who just wants a simple life. Please. Give me some privacy and space! My marriage is over, don’t ruin my parents… please stop talking about it. Please…

　　Chen He’s profile

　　Chen He is a Chinese mainland actor from Changle City, Fujian Province. He graduated from the Performance Department of Shanghai Theater Academy in 2008.

　　In 2009, he starred in Zeng Xiaoxian, a "good man" in the urban romantic comedy "Love Apartment". In the same year, he played Cheng Xiaohe in the TV series "Days with Stewardesses".

　　In 2010, he played Zeng Xiaoxian in "Love Apartment Gaiden" and "Love Apartment 2".

Buy millet SU7 purchase tax is free! What is the impact of the New Deal on new energy vehicles？

The small partners who are concerned about new energy vehicles must have learned a recent news: the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology issued a new announcement, announcing that a series of models will enjoy preferential policies for purchase tax reduction and exemption. In the model catalog, Xiaomi SU7,Seals and Zhijie S7, which are particularly popular recently, are listed!

On the one hand, these models have excellent performance, on the other hand, they will also bring real benefits to car owners in terms of purchase tax. So, how do you understand the impact of the New Deal on the new energy vehicle industry?

Source: Ministry of Industry and Information Technology.

Judging from the nature, the preferential policy of purchase tax reduction is an important policy issued by the state to encourage the development of new energy vehicles and promote green travel. By reducing the purchase tax, the economic pressure on consumers to buy cars will be reduced, thus further promoting the prosperity and development of the new energy vehicle market.

The introduction of the purchase tax reduction and exemption policy further highlights the state’s attention and support for the new energy automobile industry. With the increasing awareness of global environmental protection and the rapid development of new energy vehicle technology, new energy vehicles will occupy a dominant position in traffic travel in the future.

At the same time, according to the data of China Automobile Association, in March 2024, the production and sales of new energy vehicles were 863,000 and 883,000 respectively, up by 28.1% and 35.3% year-on-year and 86.0% and 85.1% quarter-on-quarter. This is mainly due to the resumption of business operations after the Spring Festival, the large number of new cars coming on the market, and the new round of price reduction promotion in the auto market, which was encouraged by policies such as trade-in and trade-in. In March, the sales of new energy vehicles achieved significant growth on schedule, continuing the rapid growth momentum year-on-year. This time, many models covered in the new purchase tax reduction and exemption policy are actually hot models in previous months, and the intention of the state to guide the further development of new energy vehicles is very obvious.

Source: China Automobile Association

The implementation of the purchase tax reduction and exemption policy has brought tangible benefits to consumers and injected new vitality into the entire new energy vehicle market. As the "heart" of new energy vehicles, under the constant stimulation of the demand for new energy vehicles, the power battery sector will also usher in a good opportunity, and it can be forward-looking at present.

I prefer the battery ETF(SH561910) as the related target, and this one.ETFTracking the CSI battery theme index, it mainly invests in high-quality enterprises in the battery industry chain, including battery manufacturers and material suppliers. If funds are limited or there is not much time to learn more about many enterprises in the industry chain, I think investing in ETF one-click layout is a better choice.

Source: Shan Yu Qiu

Exam! Have you read all the recent reports about us in the mainstream media？

During the May 1 International Labor Day holiday, the People’s Daily, Xinhua News Agency, CCTV and other mainstream media published and broadcast many news reports related to the aviation industry. So, have you read all these reports with rich connotations and huge information?

Let’s test it together ~ ~

Top secret before the exam

A survey of mainstream media reports on the aviation industry.

Class:

Name:

Student number:

1. Multiple choice questions (Only one answer to the following questions is correct. Please choose the correct option from the alternative answers and fill in the serial number of the correct option in brackets. 5 points for each small question, 15 points in total)

1. What does the machining tolerance of () mm mean? This is equivalent to one hundred and twenty-fifth of the diameter of human hair, which is difficult to realize even with CNC machine tools. This is more accurate than the manual filing limit in the textbook, and it comes from the hands of Fang Wenmo, the chief skill expert of the aviation industry Shenyang Aircraft Industry (Group) Co., Ltd. and the "post-80 s". (Source: Xinhua News Agency’s new media "Pay tribute to ingenuity! They deserve to be praised ")

A. 0.0068 mm

B. 0.00068 mm

Reference answer

Click on the blank space to see the answer.

2. On May 1st, 2021, a special program on May 1st International Labor Day was broadcast on CCTV. What is the theme of this program? (Source: CCTV News pays tribute to the workers and welcomes the founding of the party for a hundred years! "Chinese Dream, Labor Beauty-Always March with the Party, New Journey, Special Program of May Day 2021")

A. pay tribute to the workers and welcome the centenary of the founding of the party! Chinese Dream, Labor Beauty —— Always forge ahead with the Party.

B. pay tribute to the workers and welcome the centenary of the founding of the party! Chinese Dream, Labor Beauty —— Always forge ahead with the Party in a new era

Reference answer

Click on the blank space to see the answer.

3. The posture adjustment of the fuselage requires extremely high accuracy, and the deviation of each part of the fuselage with a total length of 50 meters cannot exceed () mm.. This is like an elephant, there can be no error in the size of ants. In the past, it took more than a dozen people to work together in one month. Today, it only takes two or three people a day. The team led by Hu Yang has achieved zero breakthrough in digital assembly of large aircraft and fuselage, with a hundred times higher efficiency and millimeter accuracy. (Source: CCTV’s "Great Country Artisans and Skills to Serve the Country", which is broadcast on several key columns of CCTV’s comprehensive channel and news channel. )

A. 0.5 mm

B. 0.05 mm

Reference answer

Click on the blank space to see the answer.

Look at the pictures and talk (please match the pictures with appropriate words according to the information provided, with 10 points for each question, totaling 20 points)

4. Please choose an essay for the following pictures.

(Source: Xinhua News Agency, "Dare to melt the sun and the moon and cast ingenuity" model worker "torch in their hands")

A. Fang Wenmo polishes parts in Fang Wenmo’s studio.

B. Fang Wenmo polishes parts in the craftsman’s studio in Daguo.

Reference answer

Click on the blank space to see the answer.

5. Please choose an essay for the following pictures.

(Source: CCTV. com, look at "The exposure of the refueling screen of the night sky of the J-15 carrier aircraft")

A. the training of refueling in the air is called "threading the needle in the air" and "centimeter-level flight", and the difficulty is self-evident. It is even more thrilling to carry out this training under the condition of low light at night, and it is also recognized as the top flight course in the world. A few days ago, several J-15 carrier-based fighters of a naval carrier aviation unit continuously carried out night air partner refueling training.

B. The night gave me black eyes, but I used them to look for light.

Reference answer

Click on the blank space to see the answer.

Third, reading comprehension (read the written materials provided and answer the corresponding questions, 15 points for each question, a total of 30 points)

6. As soon as the modification training was over, Gu Chenyu immediately bought a plane ticket and flew to Chang Yao’s side. When I saw him at the airport, Chang Yao’s heart was more complicated. In the face of her missing boyfriend, the first feeling turned out to be strange. After a big hug, the small temper and emotions that had been waiting for months finally vanished. Chang Yao said: "This is probably the truest taste of missing." (Excerpt from: People’s Daily new media "Too sweet! It was love at first sight between pilots and aviation engineers.

Excuse me, what exactly is the truest taste of missing in the bold part of the text? （）

A. my heart is very complicated.

B. The feeling at first sight turned out to be strange. After a big hug, the small temper and emotions that had been waiting for months finally vanished.

Reference answer

Click on the blank space to see the answer.

7. Aviation people often say, "There is no parking lot in the air, and there is no regret medicine for flight test". Fang Wenmo said: "Just like playing the piano and throwing basketball, the basic skills of our locksmith depend on boring and monotonous repeated practice until muscle memory is formed." (Excerpt from: Xinhua News Agency’s new media "Pay tribute to ingenuity! They deserve to be praised ")

What does the author want to express through the bold part of the text? （）

A. Behind the heavy equipment of the country, the high-tech technology and the projects that break through the limits of human beings, it is inseparable from the persistent concentration, Excellence, meticulousness and pursuit of Excellence of the workers who uphold the spirit of artisans.

B. Aircraft flight test cannot be practiced repeatedly.

Reference answer

Click on the blank space to see the answer.

Four, composition (35 points)

8. Please pay attention to "Aviation Industry" WeChat WeChat official account, and write your feelings about aviation people and aviation industry in the message! Welcome to grab the sofa.

Reference answer

Click on the blank space to see the answer.

Welcome to leave a message

I wish the candidates extraordinary performance and excellent results!

How’s it going?

Peter Pan is ready to compare scores with you ~

There will be a mysterious gift waiting for you.

Iron powder must be seen.

Original title: "Exam! Have you read all the recent reports about us in the mainstream media? 》

Read the original text

标签归档上海后花园交友论坛

Gree Group ushered in a new chairman’s shareholding in Gree Electric, which has dropped to less than 4%.

On the Canadian debate program, experts from China and Singapore refuted the ＂China threat theory＂ with facts and won!

Notice of the State Council Customs Tariff Commission on Relevant Issues Concerning the Adjustment of Import Duty on Imported Articles

Announcement of the General Administration of Market Supervision on Public Solicitation of Opinions on the Provisions on Centralized Examination of Operators (Draft for Comment)

Headquarters exclusively investigates the pursuit of ＂ghost guns＂ in the United States： Why did 3D printing guns become ＂outlaws＂？

RAV4 Rongfang in Tianjin is being discounted! Lowest price 132,800, great discount today

Di Lizheba： Revealing the story behind the self-introduction of the freshmen in the play

Chen He Weibo responds to ＂divorce＂ rumors： life gathers less and leaves more

Buy millet SU7 purchase tax is free! What is the impact of the New Deal on new energy vehicles？

Exam! Have you read all the recent reports about us in the mainstream media？

近期文章

近期评论

归档

分类

标签

标签归档 上海后花园交友论坛

近期文章

近期评论

归档

分类

标签

标签归档上海后花园交友论坛