作者归档 admin

Special feature of 1905 film network The film tells the story of Bai Xiaoyu and Wang Jinjin, lovers who know each other and fall in love. They have known each other for eight years and have been in love for five years, and they have a common minority interest. Their initial love is particularly fresh and has endless topics to talk about. As this relationship slowly entered the fifth year, the love between the two changed from common ownership to differentiated sweetness, and setbacks followed.

In this program, emotional blogger Alice is invited to answer some questions about love with the story of Bai Xiaoyu and Wang Jinjin through the movie "You Lost by Me".

Grasp the universal love story of young people at present

Bai Xiaoyu and Wang Jin Jin two young people are facing two things at the same time.

The first one is the change from student days to social identity. Which city to live in, what kind of occupation to choose, how to establish yourself professionally, and how to start love under the burden of life … … Each of these is a very difficult challenge for young people.

The second problem is the difference between two people in love. In the movies, Bai Xiaoyu and Wang Jinjin have experienced some puzzles, such as different family of origin, inconsistent work pace, different places, unsynchronized work progress and inconsistent circle of friends, which are actually common problems that young people will encounter at present.

In this regard, emotional blogger Sisi thinks: "The so-called common hobby is a kind of common consumption. It is easy for a young person to spend together, but it is difficult for two people to create together in a relationship of affection." In their relationship, the boy Bai Xiaoyu wants to maintain the status quo with the woman more, and we live in Beijing safely; The girl Wang Jinjin’s wish is to fly higher and want her name to appear in the first column of the screenwriter’s signature. So what really knocked them down was the inconsistency.

Young people in love can’t see others or themselves?

In a love relationship, it is often only when you can see the other person’s contribution that you can see your own contribution and enter a benign balance.

At present, everyone is facing so many difficulties in life that it is difficult to put two people on the same plane calmly under the shackles, and the "two-way trip" for the sake of each other is becoming less and less common.

There is a paragraph in the film that echoes this. Wang Jinjin and Bai Xiaoyu pour all their dissatisfaction into a quarrel because of the trivial matter of "forgetting to bring their keys".

"I have put up with you for a long time!"

"I have put up with you for a long time!"

With the roar of kicking the wall, the feelings of the two people gradually peeled off and collapsed. Young people may think that I tolerate you in emotional relationships because I care about you. But the truth is that both sides may be patient, and the contradiction is getting deeper and deeper in patience.

Because in the new love relationship, "my" self is clearer than ever, and "your" self is bound to compromise in the process of colliding with your other half. It must be that two people collide with each other and interact with each other.

At this time, whether you can hear others, see others and work hard for the common relationship between two people is also a test of young people’s love. At this level, You Lost by Me is of great reference significance to the current young people’s view of love.

In addition to the previous level, "You Lost by Me" actually explains the parts that two people need to build, understand and support each other in love. Wang Jinjin and Bai Xiaoyu became attached to each other because of a small horror writer, which is actually a very good emotional base for couples — — Common interests.

Common hobbies can make two people have a common language to a great extent, and then it is easier to understand each other. But if we are connected with life, we need to understand each other’s living habits and work life. Two people should use communication to build an intersection, and jointly build high-rise buildings on this intersection.

Wang Jinjin made a change after realizing that the boy Bai Xiaoyu was indispensable in her life. She came to the secret room built by the boy for the girl and was willing to repair the relationship with the boy. What the audience sees from this is the growth of a girl. When you are really willing to grow up and see others, life will also give you feedback and gifts.

Love well in love, and live well in love.

Many people think that love has no answer, but in the movie, Bai Xiaoyu’s father seems to give the audience an answer. What is real life? It’s trivial. Real life can’t appear in vanity fair, and it can’t exist on the road paved with red carpets.

In fact, love is not special at all. It doesn’t mean that a handsome guy/beautiful woman falls from the sky and loves me unconditionally, so I can be complete. In love, I also want to learn how to love each other and how to run a long-term relationship.

What do you mean by living in love and loving each other in life? Is our way of life, is to build our own life with my lover.

Love is never great, it is the same as all relationships. Today, I personally created the life I like. I no longer wait for love to fall from the sky, and I no longer wait for the other half to manage it well and enjoy it alone.

Love is holding TA’s hand and creating our life together.

　　Our reporter Gong Mengze

　　Tesla put himself on the hot search again. On April 19th, on the opening day of the 19th Shanghai International Auto Show, a female car owner wore a T-shirt with the words "Brake Failure" and the Tesla trademark printed on it, stood on the roof of the Tesla show car and shouted "Tesla Brake Failure", which attracted everyone to watch.

　　At the auto show, the incident was quickly "solved". The above-mentioned female car owner (Ms. Zhang) was detained for 5 days for disturbing public order, and another car owner who participated in the rights protection sent Weibo an apology, saying that the wrong way was adopted, which caused social disorder, and she sincerely apologized to the security department of the National Convention and Exhibition Center, and should use reasonable and legal means to protect rights.

　　On the one hand, it is the detention and apology of the rights-defending car owner, on the other hand, it is Tesla’s "never compromise". On the afternoon of the incident, Tao Lin, vice president of Tesla, publicly stated: "Tesla’s recent negatives are all contributed by her (rights owner). We have no way to compromise. This is a process that must be followed in the development of a new product. " As evidence, she said that Tesla research shows that 90% of customers are willing to choose Tesla again.

　　However, such a statement has obviously not been widely recognized, and some consumers even pointed out that Tesla has continued its consistent arrogance. In this regard, Xinhua News Agency commented that who gave Tesla the "uncompromising" confidence? WeChat official account, the official of the Central Political and Legal Committee, also issued a document pointing directly at Tesla, questioning whether he was responsible for anything. What is the responsibility?

　　As of the close of the US stock market on April 19th, Tesla’s share price fell by 3.4% to US$ 714.63, and its market value shrank by US$ 24.1 billion, equivalent to about RMB 157.1 billion. On the evening of April 20, Tesla issued an apology statement saying that it would "do its best to meet the demands of car owners", but made no mention of the data of public accident vehicles.

　　Tesla owners’ rights protection on hot search

　　According to the "Securities Daily" reporter, in the past year, Tesla was repeatedly denounced by car owners in the China market because of the suspected out-of-control vehicles. However, for such incidents, Tesla mostly denies it. Looking back at the past vehicle accidents, the relevant key data is almost the most important factual basis for judging the accident responsibility.

　　However, Tesla’s vehicle driving data can only be viewed through its background at present, and it is difficult for car owners to obtain it, and it is also difficult for relevant government departments to supervise it. This leads to accidents such as brake failure and sudden acceleration, and the final interpretation right is often only owned by Tesla, which makes it difficult for many Tesla owners to defend their rights. Tesla’s "data hegemony" has also attracted widespread attention.

　　In this regard, Jia Xinguang, executive director of china automobile dealers association, said that it is very important for the police to ask Tesla to provide the source code. It is not necessary for Tesla to say "nothing", but to prove his innocence, he should take out the key data as evidence.

　　Judging from the situation of Ms. Zhang who defended her rights at the Shanghai Auto Show, the latest news shows that on April 21, the relevant departments clearly approved that the driving data generated during the use (driving) of pure electric cars belongs to the category of consumers’ right to know. To this end, Zhengzhou Zhengdong New District Market Supervision Administration ordered Tesla Automobile Sales and Service (Zhengzhou) Co., Ltd. to unconditionally provide Ms. Zhang with complete driving data half an hour before the accident.

　　Some people in the autonomous driving industry revealed to reporters that it should first be confirmed whether Tesla is equipped with an EDR (Accident Data Recorder) for recording the information of vehicles and drivers operating vehicles before, during and after the collision. "The United States, the United Kingdom and other countries mandate that electric vehicles must be equipped with EDR, but China does not." In addition, there are doubts about whether Tesla’s software development and verification process is perfect, because "there is a very small probability bug (program failure) in the software, which may not be reproduced through experiments."

　　There are obvious loopholes in institutional testing data.

　　In addition to data problems, many car owners also questioned the testing institutions entrusted by Tesla.

　　On April 20th, Zhengzhou Municipal Market Supervision Administration, in response to the rights protection incident at the Shanghai Auto Show, said that the complainant disagreed with the third party’s technical appraisal and demanded "providing complete driving data half an hour before the vehicle accident"; Tesla refused to provide relevant data for fear that the data would be used by the parties for hype and publicity.

　　Jia Xinguang believes that there are two possibilities behind the "the complainant disagrees with the third party to conduct technical appraisal" mentioned in the response. First, the third party’s testing is expensive, and the user may need to pay for the test himself. Second, even if it is really taken to a third-party agency for testing, it may not be possible to detect the problem.

　　Jia Xinguang, for example, said that a few years ago, the public "emission gate" incident caused widespread concern. At that time, Volkswagen set up cheating software specifically for official testing, which made it impossible for third-party organizations to detect problems, but there were indeed problems in the actual driving process. "If Tesla also has such cheating, then even if consumers spend money to find a third party for testing, they can’t detect the problem."

　　In March this year, in the "brake failure" incident experienced by Tesla owners in Haikou, Tesla entrusted Hainan Jieantong Automobile Inspection Service Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Jieantong) to test the accident vehicle, and the results showed that the brake system was qualified.

　　Jieantong is an enterprise with a registered capital of only 1 million yuan and only 20 employees (data in 2019). Last year, the company was also sued for refusing to compensate laborers for medical expenses. When Tesla commissioned the test, the company was established less than four years ago.

　　As it turns out, the test report presented by Jieantong is indeed obviously omitted-although the test report officially released by Tesla is stamped with CMA (China Metrology Certification), the test report shows that Tesla Model 3 is a "4X2 front drive", but in fact, Model 3 currently only has a rear drive version and a four-wheel drive version.

　　In the above-mentioned rights protection incident conducted by Ms. Zhang, Tesla once proposed to entrust China Quality Certification Center, a national third-party organization, to carry out the inspection of accident vehicles, but it was rejected. Ms. Zhang said, "We don’t disagree with the testing by a third-party organization, but we just want to choose a professional and authoritative organization for identification."

　　The reporter of Securities Daily logged into official website, China Quality Certification Center, and found that this organization belongs to China Inspection and Certification Group, which can provide certification and related technical services such as safety and performance, energy conservation and environmental protection, green and low carbon, management improvement, international certification and training, etc. It is an independent third-party certification institution for non-profit. However, in the "list of fees", the certification fees for compulsory automobile products are clearly listed.

　　In addition, Tesla’s relationship with this institution can be traced back to 2016. At that time, Tesla and China Quality Certification Center jointly launched the "Tesla Charging Partner Program".

　　"It is reasonable for consumers to doubt the fairness." Lin Shi, a columnist of Sina Finance, told reporters that China Quality Certification Center, as an enterprise, its customers include auto companies. At the same time, he said that the ability of testing institutions in the background data forensics of smart cars is very weak, especially in the absence of current appraisal standards and imperfect technical methods, and the appraisal results are even more difficult to convince the public.